...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of occupational hygiene. >Statistical modeling to determine sources of variability in exposures to welding fumes.
【24h】

Statistical modeling to determine sources of variability in exposures to welding fumes.

机译:统计模型,以确定暴露于焊接烟雾中的变异性来源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Exposures to total particulate matter (TP) and manganese (Mn) received by workers during welding and allied hot processes were analyzed to assess the sources and magnitudes of variability. METHODS: Compilation of data from several countries identified 2065 TP and 697 Mn measurements for analysis. Linear mixed models were used to determine fixed effects due to different countries, industries and trades, process characteristics, and the sampling regimen, and to estimate components of variance within workers (both intraday and interday), between workers (within worksites), and across worksites. RESULTS: The fixed effects explained 55 and 49% of variation in TP and Mn exposures, respectively. The country, industry/trade, type of ventilation, and type of work/welding process were the major factors affecting exposures to both agents. Measurements in the USA were generally higher than those in other countries. Exposure to TP was 67% higher in enclosed spaces and 43% lower with local exhaust ventilation (LEV), was higher among boilermakers and was higher when either a mild-steel base metal or a flux cored consumable was used. Exposure to Mn was 750% higher in enclosed spaces and 67% lower when LEV was present. Air concentrations of Mn were significantly affected by the welding consumables but not by the base metal. Resistance welding produced significantly lower TP and Mn exposures compared to other welding processes. Interestingly, exposures to TP had not changed over the 40 years of observation, while those of Mn showed (non-significant) reductions of 3.6% year(-1). After controlling for fixed effects, variance components between worksites and between-individual workers within a worksite were reduced by 89 and 57% for TP and 75 and 63% for Mn, respectively. The within-worker variation (sum of intraday and interday variance components) of Mn exposure was three times higher than that of TP exposure. The estimated probabilities of exceeding occupational exposure limits were very high (generally much >10%) for both agents. CONCLUSIONS: Welding exposures to TP and Mn vary considerably across the world and across occupational groups. Exposures to both contaminants have been and continue to be unacceptably high in most sectors of industry. Because exposures to the two agents have different sources and characteristics, separate control strategies should be considered to reduce welders' exposures to TP and Mn.
机译:背景/目的:分析工人在焊接和相关热过程中所接触的总颗粒物(TP)和锰(Mn)的暴露量,以评估变化的来源和大小。方法:来自多个国家的数据汇编确定了2065 TP和697 Mn的测量值用于分析。线性混合模型用于确定由于不同国家,行业和行业,过程特征和抽样方案而产生的固定效应,并估计工人之间(日间和日间),工人之间(工地内)和跨部门的方差分量工作地点。结果:固定效应分别解释了TP和Mn暴露变化的55%和49%。国家,行业/行业,通风类型和工作/焊接过程类型是影响两种试剂接触的主要因素。美国的测量值通常高于其他国家。在封闭空间中,TP的暴露量高67%,而局部排气通风(LEV)则低43%,锅炉制造商中较高,而使用低碳钢或药芯焊丝时则更高。在封闭空间中,Mn的暴露量增加了750%,当存在LEV时,其暴露量降低了67%。锰的空气浓度受焊接材料的影响很大,而不受贱金属的影响。与其他焊接工艺相比,电阻焊产生的TP和Mn暴露量大大降低。有趣的是,在40年的观测中,TP的暴露量没有变化,而Mn的暴露量(无显着性)降低了3.6%(-1)。在控制了固定影响之后,TP的工作场所之间和个体工人之间的差异分量对于TP分别降低了89%和57%,对于Mn降低了75%和63%。锰暴露的工人内部差异(日内和日间方差成分之和)比TP暴露高3倍。两种药物超过职业接触限值的估计概率非常高(通常> 10%)。结论:TP和Mn的焊接暴露在世界各地和各职业群体中差异很大。在大多数工业领域中,两种污染物的暴露水平一直很高,而且仍然继续令人无法接受。由于两种试剂的暴露源和特性不同,因此应考虑采用单独的控制策略以减少焊工对TP和Mn的暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号