首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain.
【24h】

Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain.

机译:下肢功能量表和前膝关节疼痛量表在前膝痛患者中的可靠性和反应性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective methodological study of repeated measures using a sample of consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in patients with anterior knee pain. BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain is one of the most common orthopedic complaints affecting the knee. Yet there is currently no self-report outcome measure that has well-established reliability and responsiveness, specifically for this population. As a result, clinicians and researchers may be making inappropriate conclusions regarding patient outcomes by using questionnaires that are misleading. METHODS AND MEASURES: This multisite study involved 30 patients from 4 outpatient physical therapy clinics in Dallas, TX (24 women, 6 men; age range, 16-50 years; mean+/-SD age, 35.2+/-9.1 years). Patients receiving physical therapy for a chief complaint of anterior knee pain completed the AKPS and LEFS at their initial appointment and again 2 to 3 days later. Upon completion of physical therapy, the patients completed the AKPS, LEFS, and a global rating of change form. The treating therapist also completed a global rating of change form at the patient's final visit. The mean of the patient's and therapist's global rating of change was used as the criterion measure of change. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was high for both questionnaires (ICC2,1 = 0.95 for the AKPS and 0.98 for the LEFS). A significant correlation was found between the criterion measure of change and both questionnaires. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that both questionnaires were moderately responsive with the area under the curve slightly higher for the LEFS (0.77) than the AKPS (0.69). CONCLUSION: The LEFS and the AKPS both demonstrated high test-retest reliability and appear to be moderately responsive to clinical change in patients with anterior knee pain. Reliability and responsiveness were slightly higher in the LEFS than the AKPS. Further research is needed to determine if these measures could be modified, or new measures created, to produce an even more sensitive tool for this population.
机译:研究设计:使用连续患者样本进行重复测量的前瞻性方法学研究。目的:确定前膝关节疼痛患者的前膝疼痛量表(AKPS)和下肢功能量表(LEFS)的重测信度和反应性。背景:前膝关节疼痛是影响膝盖的最常见的骨科疾病之一。但是,目前尚没有针对该人群的具有充分确立的可靠性和响应能力的自我报告结果指标。结果,临床医生和研究人员可能通过使用具有误导性的调查表对患者的结果做出不适当的结论。方法和措施:这项多地点研究涉及德克萨斯州达拉斯市4家门诊物理治疗诊所的30名患者(24名女性,6名男性;年龄范围16-50岁;平均+/- SD年龄,35.2 +/- 9.1岁)。接受物理疗法以主要治疗前膝关节疼痛的患者在初次就诊时以及在2至3天后再次完成AKPS和LEFS。在完成物理治疗后,患者完成了AKPS,LEFS和整体变化评分表。在患者最后一次就诊时,治疗师还完成了对变更表的整体评分。将患者和治疗师的总体变化等级的平均值用作变化的标准度量。结果:两种问卷的重测信度都很高(AKPS的ICC2,1 = 0.95,LEFS的0.98)。发现变化的标准度量与两个问卷之间存在显着相关性。接受者操作特征曲线分析显示,两份调查表的回答都中等,其中LEFS(0.77)的曲线下面积略高于AKPS(0.69)。结论:LEFS和AKPS均显示出较高的重测信度,并且对膝前疼痛患者的临床变化表现出适度的反应。 LEFS中的可靠性和响应性略高于AKPS。需要进一步研究以确定是否可以修改这些措施或创建新的措施,以为该人群提供更敏感的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号