...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >Comparison of the sonographic features of the abdominal wall muscles and connective tissues in individuals with and without lumbopelvic pain.
【24h】

Comparison of the sonographic features of the abdominal wall muscles and connective tissues in individuals with and without lumbopelvic pain.

机译:腰椎骨痛和无腰椎痛的人的腹壁肌肉和结缔组织的超声检查特征的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cross-sectional, case-control study.To measure and compare the resting thickness of the 4 abdominal wall muscles, their associated perimuscular connective tissue (PMCT), and interrecti distance (IRD) in persons with and without lumbopelvic pain (LPP), using ultrasound imaging.The muscles and PMCT of the abdominal wall assist in controlling the spine. Functional deficits of the abdominal wall muscles have been detected in populations with LPP. Investigations of the abdominal wall in those with LPP are primarily concerned with muscle, most commonly the transversus abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique (IO). Because the abdominal wall functions as a unit, all 4 abdominal muscles and their associated connective tissues should be considered concurrently.B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure the resting thickness of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique, IO, and TrA muscles; the PMCT planes; and IRD in 50 male and female subjects, 25 with and 25 without LPP (mean ± SD age, 36.3 ± 9.4 and 46.6 ± 8.0 years, respectively). Univariate correlation analysis was used to identify covariates. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) and the Kruskal-Wallis test (IRD) were used to compare cohorts (α = .05).The LPP cohort had less total abdominal muscle thickness (LPP mean ± SD, 18.9 ± 3.0 mm; control, 20.3 ± 3.0 mm; ANCOVA adjusted for body mass index, P = .03), thicker PMCT (LPP, 5.5 ± 0.2 mm; control, 4.3 ± 0.2 mm; ANCOVA adjusted for body mass index, P = .007), and wider IRD (LPP, 11.5 ± 2.0 mm; control, 8.4 ± 1.8 mm; Kruskal-Wallis, P = .005). Analysis of individual muscle thickness revealed no difference in the external oblique, IO, and TrA, but a thinner RA in the LPP cohort (LPP mean ± SD, 7.8 ± 1.5 mm; control, 9.1 ± 1.2 mm; ANCOVA adjusted for body mass index, P<.001).To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the morphological characteristics of all 4 abdominal muscles and PMCT in individuals with LPP. The results suggest that there may be altered loading of the PMCT and linea alba secondary to an altered motor control strategy involving a reduced contribution of the RA. Further, the change in RA and connective tissue morphology may be more evident than changes in external oblique, IO, and TrA thickness in persons with LPP. The causes and functional implications of these changes warrant further investigation, as does the role of the RA muscle in the development and persistence of LPP.
机译:横断面病例对照研究使用以下方法测量和比较患有和不患有腰椎骨痛(LPP)的人的4腹壁肌肉的静息厚度,其相关的肌周围结缔组织(PMCT)和直肠间距(IRD)超声成像。腹壁的肌肉和PMCT有助于控制脊柱。在LPP人群中已检测到腹壁肌肉的功能缺陷。 LPP患者的腹壁检查主要涉及肌肉,最常见的是腹横肌(TrA)和内斜肌(IO)。由于腹壁是一个整体,因此应同时考虑所有4个腹肌及其相关的结缔组织.B型超声成像用于测量腹直肌(RA)的静息厚度,外斜肌,IO和TrA肌肉PMCT飞机;和IRD在50名男性和女性受试者中,有25名有LPP和25名无LPP(平均年龄分别为36.3±9.4和46.6±8.0岁)。单变量相关分析用于识别协变量。协方差分析(ANCOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验(IRD)用于比较队列(α= .05).LPP队列的总腹部肌肉厚度较小(LPP平均值±SD,18.9±3.0 mm;对照,20.3 ±3.0 mm; ANCOVA调整为体重指数,P = .03),较厚的PMCT(LPP,5.5±0.2 mm;对照,为4.3±0.2 mm; ANCOVA调整为体重指数,P = .007),以及较宽的IRD (LPP,11.5±2.0mm;对照,8.4±1.8mm; Kruskal-Wallis,P = 0.005)。对单个肌肉厚度的分析显示,外斜肌,IO和TrA没有差异,但LPP队列中的RA较薄(LPP平均值±SD,7.8±1.5 mm;对照组,9.1±1.2 mm;针对体重指数调整的ANCOVA ,P <.001)。据我们所知,这是第一个研究LPP患者全部4腹肌和PMCT形态特征的研究。结果表明,可能由于改变运动控制策略(包括降低RA的贡献)而改变PMCT和白线的负载。此外,与LPP患者相比,RA和结缔组织形态的变化可能比外斜肌,IO和TrA厚度的变化更明显。这些变化的原因和功能含义,以及RA肌肉在LPP发生和持续中的作用,都需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号