...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy >The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
【24h】

The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

机译:脉冲持续时间和刺激持续时间在神经肌肉电刺激过程中最大化标准化扭矩中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of pulse duration and stimulation duration on the evoked torque after controlling for the activated area by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is commonly used in the clinic without considering the physiological implications of its parameters. METHODS AND MEASURES: Seven able-bodied, college students (mean +/- SD age, 28 +/- 4 years) participated in this study. Two NMES protocols were applied to the knee extensor muscle group in a random order. Protocol A applied 100-Hz, 450-microsecond pulses for 5 minutes in a 3-seconds-on 3-seconds-off duty cycle. Protocol B applied 60-Hz, 250-microsecond pulses for 5 minutes in a 10-seconds-on 20-seconds-off duty cycle. The amplitude of the current was similar in both protocols. Torque, torque time integral, and normalized torque for the knee extensors were measured for both protocols. MRI scans were taken prior to, and immediately after, each protocol to measure the cross-sectional area of the stimulated muscle. RESULTS: The skeletal muscle cross-sectional areas activated after both protocols were similar. The longer pulse duration in protocol A elicited 22% greater torque output than that of protocol B (P<.05). After considering the activated area in both protocols, the normalized torque with protocol A was 38% greater than that with protocol B (P<.05). Torque time integral was 21% greater with protocol A (P = .029). Protocol B failed to maintain torque at the start and the end of the 10-second activation. CONCLUSIONS: Longer pulse duration, but not stimulation duration, resulted in a greater evoked and normalized torque compared to the shorter pulse duration, even after controlling for the activated muscular cross-sectional areas with both protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 5.
机译:研究设计:对照实验室研究目的:通过磁共振成像(MRI)确定控制激活区域后,脉冲持续时间和刺激持续时间对诱发转矩的影响。背景:神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)通常在临床中使用,而不考虑其参数的生理含义。方法和措施:7名身体健康的大学生(平均+/- SD年龄,28 +/- 4岁)参加了这项研究。两种NMES协议以随机顺序应用于膝盖伸肌群。协议A以3秒开3秒关的占空比施加100 Hz,450微秒的脉冲5分钟。协议B在10秒开启20秒关闭的占空比中施加了60 Hz,250微秒脉冲持续5分钟。两种协议中的电流幅度均相似。两种方案均测量了膝部伸肌的扭矩,扭矩时间积分和标准化扭矩。在每种方案之前和之后立即进行MRI扫描,以测量受刺激肌肉的横截面积。结果:两种方案后激活的骨骼肌横截面积相似。方案A中较长的脉冲持续时间比方案B中的扭矩输出大22%(P <.05)。在两个协议中都考虑了激活区域后,协议A的标准化扭矩比协议B的标准化扭矩大38%(P <.05)。方案A的扭矩时间积分增加21%(P = .029)。协议B未能在10秒激活的开始和结束时保持扭矩。结论:与较短的脉冲持续时间相比,较长的脉冲持续时间而非刺激持续时间导致更大的诱发和标准化扭矩,即使在两种方案都控制了激活的肌肉横截面积之后也是如此。证据级别:治疗,级别5。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号