首页> 外文期刊>The American heart journal >The Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial: Clinical and angiographic profile at study entry
【24h】

The Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial: Clinical and angiographic profile at study entry

机译:糖尿病患者未来的血运重建评估:多支血管疾病(FREEDOM)试验的最佳管理:入选时的临床和血管造影资料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains uncertain for lack of an adequately powered, randomized trial. The FREEDOM trial was designed to compare contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with MVD against a background of optimal medical therapy. Methods: A total of 1,900 diabetic participants with MVD were randomized to PCI or CABG worldwide from April 2005 to March 2010. FREEDOM is a superiority trial with a mean follow-up of 4.37 years (minimum 2 years) and 80% power to detect a 27.0% relative reduction. We present the baseline characteristics of patients screened and randomized, and provide a comparison with other MVD trials involving diabetic patients. Results: The randomized cohort was 63.1 ± 9.1 years old and 29% female, with a median diabetes duration of 10.2 ± 8.9 years. Most (83%) had 3-vessel disease and on average took 5.5 ± 1.7 vascular medications, with 32% on insulin therapy. Nearly all had hypertension and/or dyslipidemia, and 26% had a prior myocardial infarction. Mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.8 ± 1.7 mg/dL, 29% had low-density lipoprotein <70 mg/dL, and mean systolic blood pressure was 134 ± 20 mm Hg. The mean SYNTAX score was 26.2 with a symmetric distribution. FREEDOM trial participants have baseline characteristics similar to those of contemporary multivessel and diabetes trial cohorts. Conclusions: The FREEDOM trial has successfully recruited a high-risk diabetic MVD cohort. Follow-up efforts include aggressive monitoring to optimize background risk factor control. FREEDOM will contribute significantly to the PCI versus CABG debate in diabetic patients with MVD.
机译:背景:由于缺乏足够有力的随机试验,糖尿病多支冠状动脉疾病(MVD)患者的最佳血运重建策略仍不确定。 FREEDOM试验旨在比较糖尿病性MVD患者在最佳药物治疗背景下的当代冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与带药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。方法:从2005年4月至2010年3月,全球共有1,900名MVD糖尿病患者被随机分为PCI或CABG。FREEDOM是一项优越性试验,平均随访时间为4.37年(至少2年),有80%的能力可检测出相对减少27.0%。我们介绍了经过筛选和随机分组的患者的基线特征,并与其他涉及糖尿病患者的MVD试验进行了比较。结果:随机队列的年龄为63.1±9.1岁,女性为29%,中位糖尿病持续时间为10.2±8.9岁。大多数(83%)患有三支血管疾病,平均服用5.5±1.7血管药物,其中32%接受胰岛素治疗。几乎所有人都患有高血压和/或血脂异常,并且26%的人先前患有心肌梗塞。平均血红蛋白A1c为7.8±1.7 mg / dL,29%的低密度脂蛋白<70 mg / dL,平均收缩压为134±20 mm Hg。 SYNTAX平均得分为26.2,具有对称分布。 FREEDOM试验参与者的基线特征与现代多支血管和糖尿病试验队列相似。结论:FREEDOM试验已成功招募了高危糖尿病MVD队列。后续工作包括积极监控以优化背景风险因素控制。在糖尿病性MVD患者中,FREEDOM将对PCI与CABG的争论做出重要贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号