...
首页> 外文期刊>The American heart journal >Variation in the definitions of bleeding in clinical trials of patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and its impact on the apparent safety of antithrombotic drugs.
【24h】

Variation in the definitions of bleeding in clinical trials of patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and its impact on the apparent safety of antithrombotic drugs.

机译:急性冠状动脉综合征和正在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的临床试验中,出血定义的变化及其对抗栓药物表观安全性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This review compares and contrasts the various criteria used to characterize bleeding (particularly major bleeding) during recent studies of antithrombotic therapies in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This review includes an analysis of recent large randomized clinical trials (published between January 2000 and September 2006; n > 3000 patients) evaluating antithrombotic drugs in patients with ACS or patients undergoing PCI who were identified using Medline searches. RESULTS: Bleeding has been shown to correlate with patient mortality and major cardiovascular events. Different definitions of bleeding, other than Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction or Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded coronary arteries bleeding criteria, were used in 9 of the 13 randomized trials that were identified and enrolled over 178,000 patients in total. These definitions overlapped to a degree but differed substantially. Bleeding rates according to several bleeding criteria within one trial illustrate that different bleeding definitions can lead to markedly different conclusions about the safety of an antithrombotic regimen. The shift toward identifying therapies that specifically attempt to reduce bleeding while maintaining efficacy at reducing ischemic complications increases the need of standardized bleeding definitions. CONCLUSIONS: A task force should be initiated to formulate an internationally accepted, meaningful, and standardized approach for reporting bleeding events. A fixed definition may not work for all disease states throughout ACS and PCI. Rather, a predefined scale of bleeding can be proposed, which moves from a more liberal definition of bleeding for elective PCI to a more conservative definition in other settings such as rescue angioplasty.
机译:背景:这项审查比较和对比用于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACSs)和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的抗血栓治疗的最新研究中用于表征出血(尤其是大出血)的各种标准。方法:本评价包括对近期大型随机临床试验(于2000年1月至2006年9月之间发表; n> 3000例患者)的分析,这些试验评估了通过Medline搜索确定的ACS患者或PCI患者的抗血栓药物。结果:出血已显示与患者死亡率和主要心血管事件相关。在确定的13项随机试验中,有9项使用了不同的出血定义,除了在心肌梗塞中溶栓,或使用链激酶和t-PA全面使用冠状动脉出血标准外,共纳入了17.8万例患者。这些定义有一定程度的重叠,但有很大的不同。在一项试验中,根据几种出血标准的出血率表明,不同的出血定义可能导致有关抗血栓形成疗法安全性的明显不同的结论。朝着明确尝试减少出血,同时保持减少缺血性并发症功效的治疗方法的转变,增加了对标准化出血定义的需求。结论:应该成立一个工作队,以制定国际上公认的,有意义的,标准化的报告出血事件的方法。固定的定义可能不适用于整个ACS和PCI的所有疾病状态。而是,可以提出预定义的出血等级,其从针对选择性PCI的更宽松的出血定义转变为在其他情况下(如抢救性血管成形术)的更为保守的定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号