首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
【24h】

Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

机译:全身PET / CT,专用高分辨率头颈部PET / CT和对比增强CT在临床上头颈M0鳞状细胞癌术前分期中的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare optimized whole-body (WB) and dedicated high-resolution contrast-enhanced PET/CT protocols and contrast enhanced CT in the preoperative staging of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: A total of 44 patients with clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection within 6 wk of diagnostic imaging. Imaging consisted of a standard WB PET/CT protocol without intravenous contrast enhancement, followed by a high-resolution dedicated head and neck (HN) PET/CT protocol, which included diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Imaging results were compared with histopathology. A 5-point scale was used to designate primary tumor localization and the presence of lymph node metastasis on a per-patient and per-level basis. For cervical nodes, receiver-operating-characteristic curves were generated to determine the differences in performance between the WB and HN PET/CT protocols and CECT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for primary tumor and cervical nodes. RESULTS: No statistical difference was observed between WB and HN PET/CT protocols, both of which significantly outperformed CECT, in the evaluation of the primary tumor. The performance of the HN PET/CT protocol was superior to that of the WB PET/CT in the detection of cervical node metastases, achieving statistical significance on a per-level basis and approaching significance on a per-patient basis, with the greatest advantage in the detection of small positive lymph nodes (<15 mm). No significant difference was observed between the WB PET/CT protocol and CECT in nodal staging, either on a per-patient or on a per-level basis. CONCLUSION: The primary advantage of the dedicated HN PET/CT protocol over the WB protocol or CECT in the staging of head and neck cancer is in the detection of small lymph node metastases.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较优化的全身(WB)和专用的高分辨率对比增强PET / CT方案以及对比增强CT在头颈部原发性鳞癌的术前分期中的作用。方法:总共44例临床上头颈M0鳞状细胞癌患者在诊断成像的6周内进行了原发性肿瘤切除和颈部解剖。成像由标准WB PET / CT方案组成,无需静脉内增强造影剂,然后是高分辨率的专用头颈部(HN)PET / CT方案,其中包括诊断质量增强的CT(CECT)。影像学结果与组织病理学进行了比较。在每个患者和每个级别的基础上,使用5分制来指定原发性肿瘤的位置和淋巴结转移的存在。对于宫颈淋巴结,生成了接收器操作特性曲线,以确定WB和HN PET / CT方案与CECT之间的性能差异。计算原发性肿瘤和宫颈淋巴结的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。结果:在原发肿瘤评估中,WB和HN PET / CT方案之间没有统计学差异,两者均明显优于CECT。在检测宫颈淋巴结转移方面,HN PET / CT方案的性能优于WB PET / CT,在每个级别上均达到统计学显着性,在每个患者方面均接近显着性,具有最大优势检测小的阳性淋巴结(<15毫米)。无论是按患者还是按水平,WB PET / CT方案和CECT在淋巴结分期方面均未观察到显着差异。结论:在头颈癌分期中,专用的HN PET / CT方案相对于WB方案或CECT的主要优势在于检测小淋巴结转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号