首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >An Improved Method for Automatic Segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.
【24h】

An Improved Method for Automatic Segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.

机译:一种自动分割心肌灌注SPECT中左心室的改进方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study describes and validates a new method for automatic segmentation of left ventricular mass (LVM) in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images. This is important for estimating the size of a perfusion defect as percentage of the left ventricle. METHODS: A total of 101 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease underwent both rest and stress MPS and MRI. A new automated algorithm was trained in 20 patients (40 MPS studies) and tested in 81 patients (162 MPS studies). The algorithm, which segmented the left ventricle in the MPS images, is based on Dijkstra's algorithm and finds an optimal mid-mural line through the left ventricular wall. From this line, the endocardium and epicardium are identified on the basis of an individually estimated wall thickness and signal intensity. The algorithm was validated by comparing LVM in both stress and rest MPS, with LVM of the manually segmented left ventricle from MRI as the reference standard. For comparison, LVM was quantified using the software quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS). RESULTS: The mean difference +/- SD in LVM between MPS and MRI was lower for the new method (6% +/- 15% LVM) than for QPS (18% +/- 19% LVM) for both mean difference (P < 0.001) and SD (P = 0.015). Linear regression analysis of LVM, comparing MPS and MRI, yielded R(2) = 0.83 using the new method and R(2) = 0.80 using QPS. Interstudy variability, measured as the coefficient of variance between rest MPS and stress MPS, was 6% for both the new method and QPS. Both the new algorithm and QPS systematically overestimated LVM in hearts with thin myocardium and underestimated LVM in hearts with thick myocardium. CONCLUSION: The new segmentation algorithm quantifies LVM with a significantly lower bias and variability than does the commercially available QPS software, when compared to manually segmented LVM by MRI. This makes the new algorithm an attractive method to use for estimating the size of the perfusion defect when expressing it as percentage of the left ventricle. This study shows that inaccurate estimation of wall thickness is the main source of error in automatic segmentation.
机译:这项研究描述并验证了一种自动分割心肌灌注SPECT(MPS)图像中的左心室质量(LVM)的新方法。这对于估计灌注缺损的大小(占左心室的百分比)非常重要。方法:总共101名患有已知或疑似冠心病的患者均接受了休息和压力MPS和MRI检查。一种新的自动化算法在20位患者中接受了培训(40个MPS研究),在81位患者中进行了测试(162个MPS研究)。该算法基于Dijkstra的算法对MPS图像中的左心室进行了分割,并找到了穿过左心室壁的最佳壁中线。从这条线,根据单独估计的壁厚和信号强度来识别心内膜和心外膜。通过比较压力和静止MPS中的LVM,并以MRI手动分割的左心室的LVM作为参考标准,对算法进行了验证。为了比较,使用软件定量灌注SPECT(QPS)对LVM进行了定量。结果:MPS和MRI在LVM中的平均差+/- SD相对于QPS(18%+/- 19%LVM)而言,新方法(6%+/- 15%LVM)均要低。 <0.001)和SD(P = 0.015)。 LVM的线性回归分析(比较MPS和MRI)使用新方法得出R(2)= 0.83,使用QPS得出R(2)= 0.80。新方法和QPS的研究间变异性(以休息MPS和压力MPS之间的变异系数衡量)均为6%。新算法和QPS都系统性地高估了心肌薄的心脏中的LVM,而低估了厚心肌的心脏中的LVM。结论:与通过MRI进行手动分段的LVM相比,新的分段算法以比市售QPS软件更低的偏差和可变性对LVM进行量化。这使新算法成为一种有吸引力的方法,可用于以左心室的百分比表示灌注缺陷的大小。这项研究表明,壁厚的不准确估算是自动分割中误差的主要来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号