首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Infectious Diseases >The heterogeneity of measles epidemiology in India: implications for improving control measures.
【24h】

The heterogeneity of measles epidemiology in India: implications for improving control measures.

机译:印度麻疹流行病学的异质性:对改善控制措施的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Measles vaccination coverage varies in India. Trainees of the Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP) investigated 8 outbreaks from 2004 through 2006 in Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal. We reviewed these outbreaks to contribute to the description of the epidemiology of measles and propose recommendations for control. METHODS: FETP trainees searched for measles cases through stimulated passive surveillance or door-to-door case search; estimated attack rates, case fatality, and the median age of case patients; interviewed mothers about vaccination status of their children; and collected serum samples for immunoglobulin M serological testing whenever possible. For 3 outbreaks, the trainees estimated the vaccine efficacy for children >12 months of age through cohort studies. RESULTS: Six of the 8 outbreaks were serologically confirmed. Compared with outbreaks in other states, outbreaks in states with vaccination coverage of >90% had a higher median age among case patients and a lower median attack rate. Six deaths (case fatality rate, 1.5%) occurred during the 5 outbreaks for which vitamin A was not used. The vaccine efficacy was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%-91%) in Himachal Pradesh. In West Bengal, it was 66% (95% CI, 44%-80%) in 2005 and 81% (95% CI, 67%-89%) in 2006. CONCLUSIONS: In states with higher coverage, attack rates were lower and case patients were older. Although states with coverage of <90% should increase 1-dose coverage and address coverage in pockets that are poorly reached, a second opportunity for measles vaccination could be considered in states such as Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. Use of vitamin A for case management needs to be generalized.
机译:背景:印度的麻疹疫苗接种覆盖率有所不同。现场流行病学培训计划(FETP)的受训人员调查了2004年至2006年在喜马al尔邦,北阿坎恰尔,泰米尔纳德邦和西孟加拉邦的8次暴发。我们回顾了这些暴发以有助于描述麻疹流行病学并提出控制建议。方法:FETP学员通过受激被动监测或门到门病例搜索来搜索麻疹病例;估计的发病率,病死率和病例患者的中位年龄;就孩子的疫苗接种状况采访了母亲;并尽可能收集血清样本进行免疫球蛋白M血清学检测。对于3次爆发,受训者通过队列研究估计了对大于12个月大的儿童的疫苗效力。结果:8例暴发中有6例通过血清学证实。与其他州的暴发相比,疫苗接种覆盖率> 90%的州的暴发病例患者中位年龄较高,发作率中位数较低。在5例未使用维生素A的暴发中,有6例死亡(病死率为1.5%)。在喜马al尔邦,疫苗效力为84%(95%置信区间[CI],74%-91%)。在西孟加拉邦,2005年为66%(95%CI,44%-80%),2006年为81%(95%CI,67%-89%)。结论:在覆盖率较高的州,攻击率较低病例患者年龄较大。尽管覆盖率低于90%的州应增加一剂剂量的覆盖率并解决难以达到的口袋中的覆盖率,但在喜马al尔邦和泰米尔纳德邦等州,可以考虑再接种一次麻疹疫苗。案例管理中应广泛使用维生素A。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号