首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.
【24h】

Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit.

机译:重症监护病房中防腐剂浸渍的导管对导管定植和导管相关的血流感染的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulphadiazine on the incidence of colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. One hundred and thirty-three patients requiring central venous catheterization were chosen at random to receive either an antiseptic-impregnated triple-lumen catheter (N=64) or a standard triple-lumen catheter (N=69). The mean (SD) durations of catheterization for the antiseptic and standard catheters were 11.7 (5.8) days (median 10; range 3-29) and 8.9 (4.6) days (median 8.0; range 3-20), respectively (P=0.006). Fourteen (21.9%) of the antiseptic catheters and 14 (20.3%) of the standard catheters had been colonized at the time of removal (P=0.834). Four cases (6.3%) of catheter-related bloodstream infection were associated with antiseptic catheters and one case (1.4%) was associated with a standard catheter (P=0.195). The catheter colonization rates were 18.7/1000 catheter-days for the antiseptic catheter group and 22.6/1000 catheter-days for the standard catheter group (P=0.640). The catheter-related bloodstream infection rates were 5.3/1000 catheter-days for the antiseptic catheter group and 1.6/1000 catheter-days for the standard catheter group (P=0.452). In conclusion, our results indicate that the use of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters has no effect on the incidence of either catheter colonization or catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients.
机译:这项研究旨在评估浸有洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银的中央静脉导管对危重患者定植和导管相关血流感染的发生率的影响。随机选择需要中央静脉导管插入的133例患者,以接受防腐剂浸渍的三腔导管(N = 64)或标准的三腔导管(N = 69)。消毒导管和标准导管的平均插管持续时间分别为11.7(5.8)天(中位数10;范围3-29)和8.9(4.6)天(中位数8.0;范围3-20)(P = 0.006) )。取出时已置菌了14个(21.9%)的无菌导管和14个(20.3%)的标准导管(P = 0.834)。导管相关的血流感染中有4例(6.3%)与消毒导管相关,而标准导管与1例(1.4%)相关(P = 0.195)。抗菌导管组的导管定植率为18.7 / 1000导管天,标准导管组为22.6 / 1000导管天(P = 0.640)。抗菌导管组的导管相关血流感染率是5.3 / 1000导管天,标准导管组是1.6 / 1000导管天(P = 0.452)。总之,我们的结果表明,在危重病患者中,使用浸渍有防腐剂的中央静脉导管对导管定植或导管相关的血流感染的发生率没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号