...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.
【24h】

Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.

机译:两种测试方法的比较,以确定三种常用的酒精基洗手液对手部卫生具有足够的抗菌活性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In Europe, the antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs is determined with a quantitative suspension test (prEN 12054) and a test under practical conditions (EN 1500). Another test method has recently been published by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (DGHM) with four differences to the European system in the in vitro tests: additional qualitative suspension tests with product dilutions to the ineffective range; a selection of the most resistant Gram-negative test strains in the qualitative suspension test, which should be used adjacent to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the quantitative suspension test; a high organic load in the quantitative suspension tests (0.3% albumin and 0.3% sheep erythrocytes); and an aqueous control in the quantitative suspension test. According to DGHM, the in vitro tests should be followed by EN 1500. We have determined the antimicrobial efficacy of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs according to both methods. prEN 12054 was carried out without organic load. The qualitative suspension tests (DGHM) were carried out with P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus hirae and Candida albicans. The quantitative suspension test (DGHM) was carried out with product dilutions of 75%, 50% and 25%, and a high organic load using the following test organisms: P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis (one product only), S. aureus, E. hirae and C. albicans. All these suspension tests were carried out in quadruplicate with each product and exposure time. EN 1500 was carried out with 3 mL of each product and an application time of 30 s. All three products achieved the required bactericidal activity of prEN 12054 and the new DGHM method within 30 s, and were equally effective with the reference hand disinfection of EN 1500 within 30 s. In our study, the DGHM test method did not provide additional information for hand rubs which exhibit their bactericidal efficacy with 3 mL within 30 s (EN 1500).
机译:在欧洲,通过定量悬浮液测试(prEN 12054)和实际条件下的测试(EN 1500)确定基于酒精的手揉搓剂的抗菌功效。德国卫生和微生物学会(DGHM)最近发布了另一种测试方法,该方法在体外测试中与欧洲体系有四个差异:产品稀释度达到无效范围的其他定性悬浮测试;在定性悬浮试验中选择最抗性的革兰氏阴性试验菌株,在定量悬浮试验中应与铜绿假单胞菌相邻使用;定量悬浮液测试中有机负荷较高(0.3%白蛋白和0.3%绵羊红细胞);定量悬浮液试验中的水性对照。根据DGHM的说法,体外测试应遵循EN1500。我们已根据两种方法确定了三种常用的基于酒精的手揉搓剂的抗菌功效。 prEN 12054在没有有机负荷的情况下进行。用铜绿假单胞菌,大肠杆菌,变形杆菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,平肠肠球菌和白色念珠菌进行定性悬浮试验(DGHM)。使用以下测试有机物进行定量悬浮测试(DGHM),产品稀释度分别为75%,50%和25%,并且有机负荷较高:铜绿假单胞菌,奇异假单胞菌(仅一种产品),金黄色葡萄球菌,大肠埃希菌和白色念珠菌。所有这些悬浮液测试均与每种产品和暴露时间一式四份进行。 EN 1500用3 mL每种产品进行,施加时间为30 s。所有这三种产品均在30 s内达到了prEN 12054和新的DGHM方法所需的杀菌活性,并且在30 s内通过参考手消毒EN 1500均具有同等效力。在我们的研究中,DGHM测试方法未提供有关擦手的附加信息,这些擦手在30 s内显示出3 mL的杀菌效果(EN 1500)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号