...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Risk stratification for surgical site infections in Australia: evaluation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index.
【24h】

Risk stratification for surgical site infections in Australia: evaluation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index.

机译:澳大利亚手术部位感染的风险分层:美国国家医院感染监测风险指数的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study evaluated the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index (RI) in Australia for different surgical site infection (SSI) outcomes (overall, in-hospital, post-discharge, deep-incisional and superficial-incisional infection) and investigated local risk factors for SSI. A SSI surveillance dataset containing 43 611 records for 13 common surgical procedures, conducted in 23 hospitals between February 2001 and June 2005, was used for the analysis. The NNIS RI was evaluated against the observed SSI data using diagnostic test evaluation statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value). Sensitivity was low for all SSI outcomes (ranging from 0.47 to 0.69 and from 0.09 to 0.20 using RI thresholds of 1 and 2 respectively), while specificity varied depending on the RI threshold (0.55 and 0.93 with thresholds of 1 and 2 respectively). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were developed for the five SSI outcomes using a range of available potential risk factors. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score >2, duration of surgery, absence of antibiotic prophylaxis and type of surgical procedure were significant risk factors for one or more SSI outcomes, and risk factors varied for different SSI outcomes. The discriminatory ability of the NNIS RI was insufficient for its use as an accurate risk stratification tool for SSI surveillance in Australia and its sensitivity was too low for it to be appropriately used as a prognostic indicator.
机译:这项研究评估了美国澳大利亚全国医院感染监测(NNIS)风险指数(RI)在不同手术部位感染(SSI)结局(整体,医院内,出院后,深切口和浅切口切口感染)的影响,并进行了调查SSI的本地风险因素。分析使用了2001年2月至2005年6月在23家医院进行的SSI监视数据集,其中包含43 611条13种常见外科手术记录的记录。使用诊断测试评估统计数据(敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值),根据观察到的SSI数据对NNIS RI进行了评估。所有SSI结果的敏感性都较低(使用RI阈值为1和2的范围分别为0.47至0.69和0.09到0.20),而特异性取决于RI阈值(分别为0.55和0.93的阈值分别为1和2)有所不同。使用一系列可用的潜在风险因素,针对五个SSI结果开发了混合效应逻辑回归模型。美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)的身体状况评分> 2,手术时间长,缺乏抗生素预防措施和手术程序类型是一项或多项SSI结果的重要危险因素,而不同SSI结果的危险因素也有所不同。 NNIS RI的区分能力不足以将其用作澳大利亚SSI监测的准确风险分层工具,并且其敏感性太低,无法将其适当地用作预后指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号