【24h】

Male circumcision: a review of the evidence

机译:男性包皮环切术:证据复习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This literature review details how male circumcision has been a subject of debate for many years with different parties quoting different benefits and risks, The incidences of these risks are seldom quantified. This paper attempts to assess the rationale for circumcision on medical, religious and cultural grounds and examines the relative rate of complications. It also attempts to assess the proposed benefits, one of which relates to infection transmission but these are small on a population scale. The stated risks of surgical complications are small. No studies show impaired sexual functioning following circumcision.. All complications are increased and of greater severity with untrained personnel performing circumcision, The available evidence does not justify routine circumcision.
机译:这篇文献综述详细介绍了男性包皮环切术如何多年来一直是争论的话题,不同的各方都引用了不同的收益和风险。很少量化这些风险的发生率。本文试图从医学,宗教和文化的角度评估包皮环切术的基本原理,并研究并发症的相对发生率。它还尝试评估提议的收益,其中之一与感染传播有关,但在人口规模上很小。规定的手术并发症风险很小。没有研究表明包皮环切术后性功能受损。未受过包皮环切术的未经培训的人员,所有并发症的发生率和严重性均增加。现有证据不能证明常规包皮环切术是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号