首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Ecology >The Review of Pros and Cons between Traditional Male Circumcision and Medical Male Circumcision in the Contemporary South Africa
【24h】

The Review of Pros and Cons between Traditional Male Circumcision and Medical Male Circumcision in the Contemporary South Africa

机译:当代南非传统男性包皮环切术与医学男性包皮环切术的利弊回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relevance and benefits of Traditional Male Circumcision (TMC) as opposed to Medical Male Circumcision (MMC) has been a topical issue globally. The purpose of this paper through desktop review seeks to elicit debates, discussions, discourses and analysis of the pros and cons between Traditional Male Circumcision (TMC) and Medical Male Circumcision (MMC). The following underpinning factors have been identified to be a panacea: TMC as an identity maker; TMC harnesses social status. TMC phenomenon is also considered to be perfidious because of: Clinical hazards and illegal initiation schools; para-professionalism associated with traditional practitioners; and conflict between the culture of TMC and modernity. The present paper recommends that: Public need to be afforded a principle of self-determination; a need for all relevant TMC stakeholders to embrace the current gaps in the TMC; and allow other TMC stakeholders to decide whether to supplant MMC or find ways to improve TMC.
机译:传统男性包皮环切术(TMC)相对于医学男性包皮环切术(MMC)的相关性和益处已成为全球热门话题。本文通过桌面审查的目的旨在引起对传统男性包皮环切术(TMC)与医学男性皮环切术(MMC)之间的利弊的辩论,讨论,论述和分析。已确认以下基础因素是万能药:TMC是身份认证者; TMC利用社会地位。由于以下原因,TMC现象也被认为是无稽之谈:与传统从业者有关的超专业主义;以及TMC文化与现代性之间的冲突。本文件建议:公众需要有自决原则;所有相关的TMC利益相关者都需要弥补TMC当前的空白;并允许其他TMC利益相关者决定是取代MMC还是找到改善TMC的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号