首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Ecology >Costs and benefits of relative bark thickness in relation to fire damage: a savanna/forest contrast.
【24h】

Costs and benefits of relative bark thickness in relation to fire damage: a savanna/forest contrast.

机译:与火灾相关的相对树皮厚度的成本和收益:稀树草原/森林对比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In fire-prone ecosystems, bark protects the stem bud bank from fire. Absolute bark thickness is a good indicator of this protective function, but it depends on stem size as well as inherent differences between species. Relative bark thickness (i.e. relative to stem diameter) takes the latter into account. We argue that relative bark thickness is an important functional trait offering insights to the evolution of species persistence in fire-prone habitats. During growth ontogeny different species can acquire absolutely thick bark through having: (i) relatively thick bark (i.e. an early commitment to thick bark) or (ii) relatively thin bark but fast stem diameter growth rates. We test the hypothesis that the most effective way of protecting tree stems from frequent fire is by having relatively thick-barked small stems. We predict that species with higher relative bark thickness are more common in fire-prone habitats. In habitats with long fire-free intervals such as rainforest, delayed investment in bark thickness results in thin bark. We examined the relative bark thickness of woody congeners from Australian non-fire-prone forest and fire-prone savanna and in other tree-dominated systems world-wide. We determined the relative cost of acquiring absolute bark thickness of 0.5 cm for different rates of bark allocation. The insulating benefits of bark were considered a linear function of bark thickness. Synthesis. We suggest that relatively thick bark minimizes the costs of acquiring absolutely thick bark, and it confers greater protection to smaller stems. The cost of acquiring thick bark prevents small trees from merely accumulating bark as a consequence of fast height or stem diameter growth. Accordingly, our field survey indicated that forest species had relatively thin bark and acquired thick bark only as a consequence of very large size, while fire-prone savanna species had relatively thick-barked small stems. Based on this, relative bark thickness appears to be a good predictor of local fire regimes and is a useful plant functional trait.
机译:在易火的生态系统中,树皮可保护茎芽库免遭火灾。绝对的树皮厚度可以很好地说明这种保护功能,但它取决于茎的大小以及物种之间的固有差异。相对树皮厚度(即相对于茎直径)考虑了后者。我们认为相对的树皮厚度是重要的功能性状,为易火生境中物种持久性的演变提供了见识。在个体发育过程中,不同种类的树皮可以通过以下方式获得绝对厚实的树皮:(i)相对较厚的树皮(即早期对较厚树皮的承诺)或(ii)相对较薄的树皮但茎直径增长速度快。我们检验了以下假设:保护树木免受频繁生火的最有效方法是拥有相对较粗的树皮小茎。我们预测具有较高相对树皮厚度的物种在易火生境中更为常见。在无火间隔长的栖息地(例如雨林)中,对树皮厚度的延迟投资会导致树皮变薄。我们研究了澳大利亚非易火森林和易火大草原以及全球其他以树木为主的系统中木质同类物的相对树皮厚度。我们确定了获取不同树皮分配速率的0.5 cm绝对树皮厚度的相对成本。树皮的隔热效果被认为是树皮厚度的线性函数。合成。我们建议相对较厚的树皮可将获得绝对厚的树皮的成本降到最低,并为较小的茎提供更大的保护。获取较厚的树皮的成本可防止小树由于高度或茎直径的快速增长而仅堆积树皮。因此,我们的实地调查表明,森林物种的树皮相对较薄,仅由于很大的树皮而获得了较厚的树皮,而易火的稀树草原物种则具有相对较粗的树皮小茎。基于此,相对的树皮厚度似乎是当地火灾状况的良好预测指标,并且是有用的植物功能性状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号