首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medicine and philosophy >Beyond The Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power, and the Care of the Dying: A Theoretical and Methodological Intervention into the Sociology of Brain Implant Surgery
【24h】

Beyond The Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power, and the Care of the Dying: A Theoretical and Methodological Intervention into the Sociology of Brain Implant Surgery

机译:超越预期的尸体:医学,力量和垂死的关怀:对脑植入手术社会学的理论和方法论干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drawing on and extending the Foucaultian philosophical framework that Jeffrey Bishop develops in his masterful book, The Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power, and the Care of the Dying, we undertake a sociological analysis of the neurological procedure- deep brain stimulation (DBS)-which implants electrodes in the brain, powered by a pacemaker-like device, for the treatment of movement disorders. Following Bishop's work, we carry out this analysis through a two-fold strategy. First, we examine how a multidisciplinary team evaluates candidates for this implant at a major medical center. We present excerpts from an ethnographic study of the "case conference" where disease entities are presented, contested, ratified, and made objects for intervention with this technology. The case conference becomes the key site in the transition from "person-with-illness" to "person-with-brain-implant" as a team of health professionals determines a plan of action by interpreting both statistical and "quality of life" data regarding their patients. Second, this article explores these decision-making processes through Bishop's conceptualization of evidence-based medicine, which relies on statistical approaches as the ultimate authority in knowledge production and medical decisions. We then reflect on Bishop's critique of the social sciences and the methodological, analytical, and substantive ramifications that The Anticipatory Corpse can offer future sociological work.
机译:借鉴并扩展了杰弗里·毕晓普(Jeffrey Bishop)在其精湛的著作《预期尸体:医学,力量和死亡的护理》中提出的福柯哲学框架,我们对神经学程序-深部脑刺激(DBS)进行了社会学分析,在类似起搏器的设备的驱动下,在大脑中植入电极,以治疗运动障碍。跟随毕晓普的工作,我们通过两项策略进行了分析。首先,我们研究了一个多学科团队如何在主要医疗中心评估该植入物的候选人。我们从“案例会议”的人种学研究中摘录,其中疾病实体被提出,竞争,批准并制成对象以使用该技术进行干预。案例会议成为从“病人”到“人脑植入”过渡的关键地点,因为医疗专业人员团队通过解释统计数据和“生活质量”数据来确定行动计划关于他们的病人。其次,本文通过Bishop循证医学的概念化探索这些决策过程,该过程依赖于统计方法作为知识生产和医疗决策的最终权威。然后,我们回顾了毕晓普对社会科学的批评,以及预期尸体可以提供未来社会学工作的方法论,分析论和实质性影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号