...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of communicable diseases >Comparison of direct immunofluorescence and ELISA for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in the patients of pelvic inflammatory disease.
【24h】

Comparison of direct immunofluorescence and ELISA for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in the patients of pelvic inflammatory disease.

机译:直接免疫荧光和ELISA检测盆腔炎患者沙眼衣原体抗原的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fifty female patients clinically diagnosed as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) attending Gynaecology OPD of Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital were studied for the presence of Chlamydial antigen by direct immunofluorescence (DFA) and Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) test. Out of fifty PID patients Chlamydia tracchomatis lipopolysaccharide antigen could be detected in 28% of cases by ELISA and Chlamydial outer membrane protein antigen could be detected in 32% of cases by DFA. Although in the present study DFA and ELISA compare well with each other, but DFA has been found to be more specific test as it detects outer membrane protein antigen of Chlamydia trachomatis.
机译:接受Smt妇科OPD临床诊断为盆腔炎(PID)的50名女性患者。通过直接免疫荧光(DFA)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试验研究了这样的医院,研究了衣原体抗原的存在。在50名PID患者中,ELISA检测出沙眼衣原体脂多糖抗原的占28%,DFA检测出沙眼衣原体外膜蛋白抗原的占32%。尽管在本研究中DFA和ELISA相互比较,但是DFA被发现是更特异性的检测方法,因为它可以检测沙眼衣原体的外膜蛋白抗原。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号