...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medicine and philosophy >Introduction: embryonic stem cell research, abortion, euthanasia, and the plurality of moralities in bioethics.
【24h】

Introduction: embryonic stem cell research, abortion, euthanasia, and the plurality of moralities in bioethics.

机译:简介:胚胎干细胞研究,流产,安乐死以及生物伦理学中的多种道德。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This third issue of the 36th volume of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy is a nonthematic issue. The first paper contained herein is "Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights" by Anna-Karin Andersson. Andersson argues that embryonic stem cells can, indeed, be used for genetic research even if it is the case that human embryos do have individual moral rights that ought to be respected by other moral agents. This seems at first glance to be a very puzzling claim. However, she argues this is the case because there is a temporal distinction between the intact embryo that possesses moral rights and the already destroyed embryo that no longer possesses any relevant moral rights and whose stem cells are to be utilized in research.
机译:《医学与哲学杂志》第36卷的第三期是非主题性的。本文包含的第一篇论文是Anna-Karin Andersson的“胚胎干细胞与财产权”。安德森认为,即使在人类胚胎确实具有个人道德权利的情况下,胚胎干细胞确实可以用于基因研究,而其他道德主体也应该尊重它们。乍一看,这似乎是一个令人费解的说法。但是,她认为是这种情况,因为拥有精神权利的完整胚胎与已经不再具有任何相关精神权利且已经被利用的干细胞的已经被破坏的胚胎之间存在时间差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号