首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Limited Femoral Navigation Versus Conventional Intramedullary Femoral Jig Based Instrumentation for Achieving Optimal Restoration of Mechanical Axis Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Comparative Study of 200 Knees
【24h】

Limited Femoral Navigation Versus Conventional Intramedullary Femoral Jig Based Instrumentation for Achieving Optimal Restoration of Mechanical Axis Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Comparative Study of 200 Knees

机译:有限的股骨导航与传统的基于股骨内夹具的器械实现全膝关节置换术后机械轴的最佳修复:前瞻性200膝关节比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A prospective comparative study was conducted to compare the mechanical axis post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between two groups: In the first group of 100 knees (ASM group) Articular Surface Mounted navigation system was used to guide the distal femoral cut. In the second group of 100 knees (JIG group) conventional intramedullary femoral jig was used. The postoperative mechanical axis of the leg was within 3 degrees of neutral alignment in 90% of the TKA in the ASM group (mean 178.12 degrees) as compared to 74% in the JIG group (mean 177.02 degrees). This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The data presented show that the use of limited femoral navigation leads to more accurate restoration of mechanical axis alignment when compared to conventional intramedullary femoral jigs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:进行了一项前瞻性比较研究,以比较两组之间的全膝关节置换术后(TKA)的机械轴:在第一组100例膝关节(ASM组)中,使用关节表面安装导航系统引导股骨远端切开。在第二组100个膝盖(JIG组)中,使用常规的髓内股骨夹具。 ASM组90%的TKA(平均178.12度)中,腿的术后机械轴在中性对齐的3度以内(JIG组为74%(平均177.02度))。这种差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。呈现的数据表明,与常规的髓内股骨夹具相比,有限的股骨导航的使用可导致更准确地恢复机械轴对准。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号