首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Effectiveness of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched from other antipsychotics: A randomized, 6-week, open-label study
【24h】

Effectiveness of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched from other antipsychotics: A randomized, 6-week, open-label study

机译:卢拉西酮对精神分裂症或精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药从其他抗精神病药转用的有效性:一项为期6周的随机,开放标签研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of switching patients to lurasidone using 3 different dosing strategies. Method: Adults with DSM-IV-defined schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in a nonacute phase of illness were randomized to 1 of 3 lurasidone dosing regimens for the initial 2 weeks of the study: (1) 40 mg/d for 2 weeks; (2) 40 mg/d for 1 week, increased to 80 mg/d on day 8 for week 2 (up-titration group); and (3) 80 mg/d for 2 weeks. Lurasidone was then flexibly dosed (40-120 mg/d) for the subsequent 4 weeks of the study. The preswitch antipsychotic agent was tapered by day 7 to 50% of the original dose and discontinued by the end of week 2. Subjects were stratified on the basis of whether the primary preswitch antipsychotic medication was classified as "sedating" (olanzapine or quetiapine) or "nonsedating" (all other antipsychotics). The primary outcome measure was time to treatment failure, defined as any occurrence of insufficient clinical response, exacerbation of underlying disease, or discontinuation due to an adverse event. The study was conducted from June 2010 to May 2011. Results: Of 240 subjects treated in this study, 86 (35.8%) were treated with an antecedent sedating antipsychotic, and 154 (64.2%) were treated with an antecedent nonsedating antipsychotic. Nineteen (7.9%) of the 240 patients experienced treatment failure. No clinically relevant differences were observed when the 3 randomized switch groups were compared. Treatment failure rates were 10/86 (11.6%) versus 9/154 (5.8%) among subjects who had been receiving a preswitch sedating versus nonsedating antipsychotic medication, respectively. Consistent with prior studies of lurasidone, there was no signal for clinically relevant adverse changes in body weight, glucose, insulin, lipids, or prolactin; mean improvements in weight and lipids were observed. Movement disorder rating scales did not demonstrate meaningful changes. The incidence of akathisia as an adverse event was 12.5%; only 1 subject (0.4%) discontinued due to akathisia. Conclusions: Switching patients to lurasidone can be successfully accomplished by starting at 40 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 80 mg/d for 2 weeks, or 40 mg/d for 1 week followed by 80 mg/d the second week. ?
机译:目的:研究使用3种不同的给药策略将患者转为接受拉西酮的有效性。方法:在研究的最初2周中,将处于非急性疾病阶段且患有DSM-IV定义的精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的成年人随机分配至3种lurasidone给药方案中的1种:(1)40 mg / d,持续2周; (2)1周40 mg / d,第2周第8天增加至80 mg / d(滴定组); (3)80毫克/天,持续2周。然后在接下来的4周研究中灵活剂量(40-120 mg / d)卢拉西酮。转换前抗精神病药在第7天逐渐减少至原始剂量的50%,并在第2周结束时停药。根据转换前抗精神病药的主要用药分类为“镇静剂”(奥氮平或喹硫平)还是对患者进行分层“镇静剂”(所有其他抗精神病药)。主要结局指标是治疗失败的时间,定义为临床反应不足,潜在疾病加重或由于不良事件而中断治疗的任何发生。该研究于2010年6月至2011年5月进行。结果:在该研究中治疗的240名受试者中,有86例(35.8%)接受了先行镇静抗精神病药的治疗,有154例(64.2%)接受了先行的非镇静抗精神病药的治疗。 240名患者中有19名(7.9%)经历了治疗失败。比较3个随机开关组时,未观察到临床相关差异。在接受术前镇静和非镇静抗精神病药物治疗的受试者中,治疗失败率分别为10/86(11.6%)和9/154(5.8%)。与卢拉西酮的先前研究一致,没有信号表明体重,葡萄糖,胰岛素,脂质或催乳激素的临床相关不良变化;观察到体重和脂质的平均改善。运动障碍评分量表未显示出有意义的变化。静坐不良为不良事件的发生率为12.5%;仅1名受试者(0.4%)因静坐不全而中断。结论:以40 mg / d的剂量开始2周,或以80 mg / d的剂量开始2周,或以40 mg / d的剂量开始1周,然后在第二周以80 mg / d的剂量开始,可以成功地将患者转换为卢拉西酮。 ?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号