首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.

机译:每日60 mg和120 mg度洛西汀在因严重抑郁而住院的患者中的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hospitalized patients with severe depression and potential suicidal ideation/behavior have earlier and better response to duloxetine 120 mg daily than 60 mg daily. METHOD: Adults from 34 sites in 4 countries with severe major depressive disorder, defined by DSM-IV criteria, who were demonstrating Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores >/= 30, 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) scores >/= 12, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) >/= 4 and hospitalized >/= 2 weeks underwent double-blind treatment with either duloxetine 60 mg (n = 167) or 120 mg (n = 171) daily for 8 weeks. Patients treated with 60 mg/d who did not respond had their doses titrated up to 120 mg/d. Primary outcome was the difference in baseline to week 4 change in MADRS scores between the groups. Secondary outcomes were baseline to week 8 changes in MADRS and HDRS-6 scores, response and remission, CGI-S scores, CGI-Improvement scores, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores, and Reasons For Living inventory results. Safety was also assessed. The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean baseline to week 4 MADRS score change between the 60-mg (-20.1) and 120-mg (-19.9) groups (P = .88). At week 4, 96/166 (60 mg) and 106/170 (120 mg) patients responded and maintained responses at week 8 by further decreasing mean MADRS scores to 5.8 (60 mg) and 5.6 (120 mg). At week 8, 226/336 (67.3%) patients achieved remission, with no difference demonstrated between groups. Most secondary efficacy measures were significantly reduced from baseline to week 8 within each group and did not differ between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed with > 10% frequency in both groups were headache and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine 60-mg and 120-mg doses were equally effective and demonstrated no significant differences in treating severe depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients. The safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine in both dosages did not differ and was similar to those reported in previous duloxetine studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00422162.
机译:目的:评估住院的患有严重抑郁症和潜在自杀意念/行为的患者是否对每天120 mg度洛西汀比每天60 mg有更早,更好的反应。方法:根据DSM-IV标准,来自4个国家/地区的34个严重重度抑郁症患者的成年人表现出的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)得分> / = 30,六项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS- 6)得分> / = 12,并且临床总体印象-疾病严重程度评分(CGI-S)> / = 4且住院治疗> / = 2周,接受了60 mg洛洛西汀(n = 167)或120的双盲治疗每日一次(n = 171),持续8周。用60 mg / d治疗无反应的患者的剂量最高可升至120 mg / d。主要结局是两组之间MADRS评分在基线至第4周变化之间的差异。次要结果是第8周的MADRS和HDRS-6评分,反应和缓解,CGI-S评分,CGI改善评分,患者总体印象-改善,汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分和生存原因清单结果变化的基线。还评估了安全性。该研究在2007年2月9日至2008年8月26日之间进行。结果:60 mg(-20.1)和120 mg(-19.9)组的平均基线至第4周的MADRS得分变化无明显差异。 (P = .88)。在第4周,通过进一步将平均MADRS评分降低至5.8(60 mg)和5.6(120 mg),96/166(60 mg)和106/170(120 mg)患者缓解并维持了反应。在第8周,有226/336(67.3%)的患者实现了缓解,两组之间无差异。每组中大多数次要疗效指标从基线降低至第8周,两组之间无差异。在两组中观察到的发生治疗的不良事件的发生率均> 10%,分别为头痛和恶心。结论:度洛西汀60毫克和120毫克剂量同样有效,在住院患者的严重抑郁症状治疗中无显着差异。两种剂量的度洛西汀的安全性和耐受性特征没有差异,与先前的度洛西汀研究中报道的相似。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00422162。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号