首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Comparative efficacy of risperidone and clozapine in the treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a retrospective analysis.
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of risperidone and clozapine in the treatment of patients with refractory schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a retrospective analysis.

机译:利培酮和氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症或精神分裂症患者中的比较疗效:回顾性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is effective in up to 60% of patients with refractory schizophrenia, whereas the efficacy of risperidone remains unknown. This retrospective study examined the relative efficacy of these drugs in chronically institutionalized patients refractory to conventional antipsychotic agents. METHOD: A total of 24 patients who at different time periods had received adequate trials of both clozapine and risperidone and met our inclusion criteria for minimum dose and duration of each trial were included; for clozapine, a minimum dose of 300 mg/day had to be maintained for at least 12 weeks, and for risperidone, a minimum dose of 6 mg/day for at least 6 weeks. Information obtained from systematic retrospective chart review was blindly rated by 2 psychiatrists using the 7-point Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale on overall clinical state and along specific symptom domains of positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and aggressive behavior. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD dose was 520+/-94 mg/day for clozapine and 7.5+/-2.2 mg/day for risperidone. Fourteen patients (58%) were classified as responders to clozapine, while 6 (25%) responded to risperidone (CGI-I score of 1 or 2); on specific symptom domains, response rates to clozapine were 38% (9/24) on positive symptoms, 29% (7/24) on negative symptoms, and 71% (12/17) on aggressive behavior. For risperidone, response rates were 17% (4/24) on positive symptoms, 8% (2/24) on negative symptoms, and 41% (7/17) on aggressive behavior. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the utility of first giving a risperidone trial in a treatment algorithm for refractory patients because of its better risk/benefit profile compared with clozapine. Clozapine, however, remains our gold standard in the management of these patients.
机译:背景:氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症患者中的有效率为60%,而利培酮的疗效尚不清楚。这项回顾性研究检查了这些药物在常规抗精神病药物难以治疗的慢性住院患者中的相对疗效。方法:总共有24名患者在不同时期接受了氯氮平和利培酮的充分试验,并符合我们纳入标准的每项试验的最低剂量和持续时间;对于氯氮平,至少必须维持300毫克/天的剂量至少12周,对于利培酮,则至少应维持6毫克/天的剂量至少6周。从系统回顾性图表审查中获得的信息由2位精神病医生使用7点临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)量表对整体临床状态以及阳性症状,阴性症状和攻击行为的特定症状范围进行盲目评分。结果:氯氮平的平均+/- SD剂量为520 +/- 94 mg /天,利培酮的平均+/- SD剂量为7.5 +/- 2.2 mg /天。十四名患者(58%)被分类为氯氮平有反应,而六名患者(25%)对利培酮有反应(CGI-I评分为1或2);在特定症状域中,氯氮平的阳性症状缓解率为38%(9/24),阴性症状为29%(7/24),攻击行为为71%(12/17)。对于利培酮,阳性症状的缓解率为17%(4/24),阴性症状的缓解率为8%(2/24),攻击行为的缓解率为41%(7/17)。结论:这项研究的结果支持首先在难治性患者的治疗方案中进行利培酮试验的实用性,因为与氯氮平相比,利培酮具有更高的风险/获益特征。然而,氯氮平仍然是这些患者治疗的金标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号