首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Treatment of postpartum depression, part 2: a critical review of nonbiological interventions.
【24h】

Treatment of postpartum depression, part 2: a critical review of nonbiological interventions.

机译:产后抑郁症的治疗,第2部分:对非生物干预措施的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: While postpartum depression is a common mental condition with significant burden, it often remains undiagnosed and untreated. The objective of this article is to critically review the literature to determine the current state of scientific knowledge related to the treatment of postpartum depression from a nonbiological perspective. DATA SOURCES: Databases searched for this review included MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, and the WHO Reproductive Health Library from 1966 to 2003. The search terms used were postpartum/postnatal depression and randomized controlled/clinical trials. Published peer-reviewed articles in English from 1990 to 2003 were included in the review, although select earlier studies were also included based on good methodological quality and/or the absence of more recent work. METHOD: The criteria used to evaluate the interventions were based on the standardized methodology developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies that met inclusion criteria were examined. These studies included interpersonal psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, peer and partner support, nondirective counseling, relaxation/massage therapy, infant sleep interventions, infant-mother relationship therapy, and maternal exercise. Although some of these interventions have been better studied for depression unrelated to childbirth, methodological limitations render their efficacy equivocal for postpartum depression. CONCLUSIONS: Definite conclusions cannot be reached about the relative effectiveness of most of the nonbiological treatment approaches due to the lack of well-designed investigations. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare different treatment modalities, examine the effectiveness of individual treatment components, and determine which treatments are most useful for women with different risk factors or clinical presentations of postpartum depression.
机译:背景:产后抑郁症是一种常见的精神疾病,负担沉重,但通常仍未得到诊断和治疗。本文的目的是从非生物学的角度批判性地复习文献,以确定与产后抑郁症治疗相关的科学知识的现状。数据来源:检索此评价的数据库包括1966年至2003年的MEDLINE,PubMed,CINAHL,PsycINFO,EMBASE,ProQuest,Cochrane图书馆和WHO生殖健康图书馆。使用的搜索词是产后/产后抑郁症和随机对照/临床审判。 1990年至2003年以英语发表的经同行评审的文章也包括在该评论中,尽管基于良好的方法学质量和/或缺乏较新的研究成果,也包括了一些较早的研究。方法:用于评估干预措施的标准基于美国预防服务工作队和加拿大预防保健工作队开发的标准化方法。结果:检查了二十一项符合纳入标准的研究。这些研究包括人际心理治疗,认知行为治疗,同伴和伴侣支持,无指导性咨询,放松/按摩治疗,婴儿睡眠干预,婴幼儿关系治疗和母亲运动。尽管对与分娩无关的抑郁症进行了一些更好的干预研究,但方法学上的局限性使得其对产后抑郁症的疗效尚无定论。结论:由于缺乏精心设计的调查,无法对大多数非生物治疗方法的相对有效性得出明确的结论。需要随机对照试验来比较不同的治疗方式,检查各个治疗成分的有效性,并确定哪种治疗方法对于具有不同危险因素或产后抑郁症临床表现的女性最有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号