...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >An integrated analysis of acute treatment-emergent extrapyramidal syndrome in patients with schizophrenia during olanzapine clinical trials: comparisons with placebo, haloperidol, risperidone, or clozapine.
【24h】

An integrated analysis of acute treatment-emergent extrapyramidal syndrome in patients with schizophrenia during olanzapine clinical trials: comparisons with placebo, haloperidol, risperidone, or clozapine.

机译:奥氮平临床试验期间精神分裂症患者的急性突发性锥体外系综合症的综合分析:与安慰剂,氟哌啶醇,利培酮或氯氮平的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The frequency and severity of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) were evaluated in patients with DSM-III or DSM-IV schizophrenia in the acute phase (- 8 weeks) of randomized, double-blind, controlled trials from the integrated olanzapine clinical trial database. METHOD: This retrospective analysis included 23 clinical trials and 4611 patients from November 11, 1991, through July 31, 2001. Incidences of dystonic, parkinsonian, and akathisia events were compared using treatment-emergent adverse-event data. Categorical analyses of Simpson-Angus Scale and Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) scores, use of anticholinergic medications, and baseline-to-endpoint changes in Simpson-Angus Scale and BAS scores were compared. RESULTS: A significantly smaller percentage of olanzapine-treated patients experienced dystonic events than did haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.047). A significantly greater percentage of haloperidol-treated patients experienced parkinsonian (p <.001) and akathisia(p <.001) events than did olanzapine-treated patients. Categorical analysis of Simpson-Angus Scale scores showed significantly more haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.004) developed parkinsonism than did olanzapine-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly greater reductions in Simpson-Angus Scale scores than did haloperidol- (p <.001), risperidone- (p <.001), or clozapine-treated (p =.032) patients. Categorical analysis of BAS scores showed significantly more haloperidol-treated patients experienced treatment-emergent akathisia versus olanzapine-treated patients (p <.001). Significantly greater reductions in BAS scores were experienced during olanzapine treatment versus placebo (p =.007), haloperidol (p <.001), and risperidone (p =.004) treatments. A significantly smaller percentage of olanzapine-treated patients received anticholinergic medications compared with that of haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.018). Compared with thatin olanzapine-treated patients, the duration of anticholinergic cotreatment was significantly longer among haloperidol- (p <.001) or risperidone-treated patients (p =.040) and significantly shorter among clozapine-treated patients (p =.021). CONCLUSION: This analysis of available data from olanzapine clinical trials lends additional support to olanzapine's favorable EPS profile.
机译:背景:在综合性奥氮平临床试验数据库的随机,双盲,对照试验的急性期(-8周)中,对DSM-III或DSM-IV精神分裂症患者的锥体外系综合征(EPS)的频率和严重性进行了评估。方法:这项回顾性分析包括1991年11月11日至2001年7月31日的23项临床试验和4611例患者。使用治疗紧急不良事件数据比较了肌张力障碍,帕金森病和静坐症的发生率。比较了Simpson-Angus量表和Barnes Akathisia量表(BAS)评分,抗胆碱能药物的使用以及Simpson-Angus量表和BAS评分的基线到终点变化的分类分析。结果:与氟哌啶醇(p <.001)或利培酮治疗的患者(p = .047)相比,奥氮平治疗的患者发生肌张力障碍事件的比例显着较小。与奥氮平治疗的患者相比,氟哌啶醇治疗的患者发生帕金森病(p <.001)和静坐无力(p <.001)的比例显着更高。 Simpson-Angus量表评分的分类分析显示,氟哌啶醇-(p <.001)或利培酮治疗的患者(p = .004)发生帕金森病的比例明显高于奥氮平治疗的患者。与氟哌啶醇(p <.001),利培酮-(p <.001)或氯氮平治疗(p = .032)的患者相比,奥氮平治疗的患者在Simpson-Angus量表得分上的降低幅度更大。 BAS评分的分类分析显示,与奥氮平治疗的患者相比,氟哌啶醇治疗的患者出现了紧急治疗的静坐不愈(p <.001)。奥氮平治疗期间,与安慰剂(p = .007),氟哌啶醇(p <.001)和利培酮(p = .004)治疗相比,BAS得分明显降低。与氟哌啶醇(p <.001)或利培酮治疗的患者(p = .018)相比,奥氮平治疗的患者接受抗胆碱能药物的比例要少得多。与奥氮平治疗的患者相比,氟哌啶醇(p <.001)或利培酮治疗的患者(p = .040)的抗胆碱能联合治疗时间明显更长,而氯氮平治疗的患者(p = .021)则显着较短。结论:对奥氮平临床试验的可用数据进行的分析为奥氮平的有利每股收益特征提供了额外的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号