首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of dermatological treatment >A comparative study of hair removal at an NHS hospital: Luminette intense pulsed light versus electrolysis
【24h】

A comparative study of hair removal at an NHS hospital: Luminette intense pulsed light versus electrolysis

机译:NHS医院脱毛的比较研究:Luminette强脉冲光与电解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Twenty-five women, referred for hair removal by electrolysis, were enrolled in a split face study to treat facial hirsutism. Each patient was treated on six occasions: one-half of the face with electrolysis and the other side with an intense pulsed light source. Patients were evaluated with respect to reduction in hair counts, side effects and discomfort during treatment. Re-growth was assessed at 3, 6 and 9 months following treatment. All patients, except one with very sparse, fair hair growth, preferred treatment with the Intense Pulsed Light and rated their average hair reduction with this method as 77% after five treatments. The overall patient satisfaction rates as determined by visual analogue scales were 8.3 out of 10 for IPL and 5.4 out of 10 for electrolysis.
机译:25名因电解脱毛的妇女参加了一项分脸研究,以治疗面部多毛症。每位患者接受了六次治疗:一半的面部电解,另一侧的强脉冲光源。对患者在治疗过程中减少的毛发计数,副作用和不适感进行了评估。在治疗后3、6和9个月评估了再生长。除一位患者头发稀疏,头发白皙之外,所有患者均首选使用强脉冲光治疗,并且经过五次治疗后,使用该方法的平均头发平均减少率为77%。通过视觉模拟量表确定的总体患者满意度对于IPL为8.3(满分10分),对于电解为10:5.4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号