首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry >A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars
【24h】

A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars

机译:树脂改性玻璃-离子聚合物在二类磨牙中的3年存活率的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the three-year survival rate of Class II resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), Vitremer, restorations in primary molars and to compare these results with measurements of survival of Class II restorations of standard restorative materials. Study Design: Data on Class II restorations placed in primary molars during a six-year period were collected through a chart review and radiographic evaluation in the office of a board-certified pediatric dentist. A radiograph showing that the restoration was intact was required at least 3 years after placement to qualify as successful. If no radiograph existed, the restoration was excluded. If the restoration was not found to be intact radiographically or was charted as having been replaced before three years it was recorded as a failure. The results of this study were then compared to other standard restorative materials using normalized annual failure rates. Results: Of the 1,231 Class II resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations placed over six years 427 met the inclusion criteria. There was a 97.42% survival rate for a 3-year period equivalent to an annual failure rate of 0.86%. Conclusions: A novel approach comparing materials showed that in this study Vitremer compared very favorably to previously published success rates of other standard restorative materials (amalgam, composite, stainless steel crown, compomer) and other RMGIC studies.
机译:目的:确定II级树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC),Vitremer的三年磨牙的修复率,并将这些结果与标准修复材料的II级修复物的生存率进行比较。研究设计:在六年的时间里,通过板级认证的儿科牙医办公室的病历图审查和射线照相评估,收集了放置在第一磨牙中的II类修复物的数据。放置后至少3年的射线照相表明修复体是完整的,才算合格。如果不存在射线照片,则排除修复体。如果发现修复体在射线照相上未完好无损,或在三年前被记录为已被更换,则记录为失败。然后,使用标准化的年故障率,将该研究结果与其他标准修复材料进行比较。结果:在六年内放置的1,231种II类树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥修复物中,有427种符合纳入标准。三年期间的存活率为97.42%,相当于每年失败率0.86%。结论:一种比较材料的新颖方法表明,在该研究中,Vitremer与先前公布的其他标准修复材料(汞合金,复合材料,不锈钢牙冠,复合材料)和其他RMGIC研究的成功率相比非常好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号