首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry >Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients.
【24h】

Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients.

机译:儿科牙科患者三种清醒镇静方案的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical success of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients. A clinical trial was performed wherein dental treatment was administered to pediatric patients ASA I and II under conscious sedation.. Fifty-four children were divided into three groups of 18 patients each, randomly assigned Group A received hydroxyzine (2 mg/kg 2 h before treatment and a subsequent dose of 1 mg/kg 20 min before treatment) orally; group B received 0.50 mg/kg midazolam mixed with 1.5 mg/kg hydroxyzine 20 min before treatment orally; group C received chloral hydrate, 50 mg/kg mixed with 1.5 mg/kg hydroxyzine 20 min before treatment orally. The Ohio State Behavioral Rating Scale (OSBRS) showed statistically significant differences between groups B and C with respect to group A. The regimens of midazolam or chloral hydrate mixed with hydroxyzine represent excellent choices for conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较三种清醒镇静方案对儿科牙科患者的临床成功率。进行了一项临床试验,其中在有意识的镇静作用下对儿科患者ASA I和II进行了牙科治疗。54名儿童分为三组,每组18名患者,随机分配A组在接受治疗前2小时接受羟嗪(2 mg / kg治疗和治疗前20分钟的后续剂量1 mg / kg)口服; B组在口服治疗前20分钟接受0.50 mg / kg咪达唑仑与1.5 mg / kg羟嗪混合。 C组口服治疗前20分钟,接受50 mg / kg水合氯醛与1.5 mg / kg羟嗪混合。俄亥俄州状态行为量表(OSBRS)显示,B组和C组之间相对于A组在统计学上有显着差异。咪达唑仑或水合氯醛与羟嗪的治疗方案是儿童牙科患者有意识镇静方案的绝佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号