首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of heart valve disease >Reoperative right ventricular outflow tract conduit reconstruction: risk analyses at follow up.
【24h】

Reoperative right ventricular outflow tract conduit reconstruction: risk analyses at follow up.

机译:右心室流出道再造术再造:随访时的风险分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduits are implanted in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) of children, with the knowledge that future reoperation will likely be required. The authors' experience of conduit RVOT reconstruction was reviewed in order to assess the frequency of conduit replacement and to determine risk factors for conduit dysfunction and failure. METHODS: Between January 1980 and April 2007, a total of 261 patients (mean age 8.7 +/- 11.7 years) underwent primary RVOT reconstruction with an RV-PA conduit at the authors' institution. There were 19 (7%) early deaths. Among the survivors, 84 (35%) underwent conduit explant at the implanting hospital with insertion of a second conduit at a mean of 6.0 +/- 3.7 years (range: 7 months to 22 years) after the first implantation. The primary operation and reoperation patient groups were compared with regard to the incidence of early death, late death, conduit-related intervention without explant, and conduit explant. RESULTS: Six risk factors for mortality were significant on univariate analyses: surgery before 1992 (p = 0.005), age 3 months (p = 0.001), diagnosis of truncus arteriosus (p 0.001), reconstruction with allografts (p = 0.05), association with interrupted aortic arch (p = 0.05) and with truncal valve insufficiency (p = 0.05). Of these six factors, only the diagnosis of truncus arteriosus (p = 0.001) and surgery before 1992 (p = 0.05) remained significant by multivariate analysis. Univariable analysis was performed for multiple factors, of which the following were found to be significant: body weight (p 0.003), age (p = 0.002), conduit diameter (p 0.0001), conduit type (p = 0.006), and diagnosis of truncus arteriosus (p 0.0001). Multivariable analysis of significant univariable risks revealed small allograft diameter (p 0.001) and diagnosis of truncus arteriosus (p 0.001) to be significant risk-factors for need of replacement. CONCLUSION: Most RVOT conduits placed in children will eventually require replacement. Patient survival for conduit replacement is comparable to that for primary conduit placement. Reoperative conduit RVOT reconstruction is possible, with low morbidity and mortality.
机译:研究背景和目的:将右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)导管植入儿童的右心室流出道(RVOT)中,并了解将来可能需要再次手术。作者评估了导管RVOT重建的经验,以评估导管更换的频率并确定导管功能障碍和衰竭的危险因素。方法:在1980年1月至2007年4月之间,总共261例患者(平均年龄8.7 +/- 11.7岁)在作者所在的机构接受了RV-PA导管的初次RVOT重建。有19(7%)早期死亡。在幸存者中,有84名(35%)在植入医院接受了导管外植,并在首次植入后平均6.0 +/- 3.7年(范围:7个月至22年)插入了第二根导管。比较了主要手术和再手术患者组的早期死亡,晚期死亡,无外植体的导管相关干预和导管外植体的发生率。结果:单因素分析显示死亡的六个危险因素很显着:1992年之前的手术(p = 0.005),年龄<3个月(p = 0.001),诊断为大动脉截骨(p <0.001),同种异体移植重建(p = 0.05) ,与主动脉弓中断(p = 0.05)和颈动脉瓣关闭不全(p = 0.05)相关。在这六个因素中,通过多变量分析,仅动脉瘤(p = 0.001)和1992年之前的手术(p = 0.05)的诊断仍然很重要。对多个因素进行了单变量分析,其中以下因素很重要:体重(p <0.003),年龄(p = 0.002),导管直径(p <0.0001),导管类型(p = 0.006)和动脉瘤的诊断(p <0.0001)。对重大单因素风险的多变量分析显示,同种异体移植物直径较小(p <0.001),动脉瘤的诊断(p <0.001)是需要更换的重要风险因素。结论:大多数放置在儿童中的RVOT导管最终将需要更换。更换导管的患者生存率与主要导管放置的生存率相当。可以进行再造性RVOT导管,发病率和死亡率低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号