...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume >Comparison of palmar fixed-angle plate fixation with K-wire fixation of distal radius fractures (AO A2, A3, C1) in elderly patients
【24h】

Comparison of palmar fixed-angle plate fixation with K-wire fixation of distal radius fractures (AO A2, A3, C1) in elderly patients

机译:老年patients骨远端radius骨骨折(AO A2,A3,C1)手掌固定角钢板固定与K线固定的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was to compare the results of two operative techniques used for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients classified as AO types A2, A3, and C1. Patients were treated with either fixed-angle volar plates or K-wires using a combined Kapandji and Willenegger technique. The functional results were determined after 3, 6, and 12 months. We included 40 patients aged over 65 years. Twenty-one patients were treated with plate fixation and 19 with K-wire fixation. The functional results, after 1 year, were nearly the same in both treatment groups, suggesting that either method is suitable for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures of AO types A2, A3, and C1 in elderly patients. Sixteen of 21 patients with plate fixation and 17 of 19 patients with K-wire fixation present good results as assessed by the Castaing score. The median DASH score was three in both groups after 1 year. The patients with plate fixation were able to resume activities of daily living 4 weeks earlier. The most common complication was an intermediate post-traumatic median nerve irritation. Both methods are suitable for the treatment of elderly patients with unstable distal radius fractures of AO types A2, A3, and C1. If early functional post-operative care is important, palmar fixed-angle plate fixation is an ideal treatment approach. Otherwise, K-wire fixation is an effective, minimally invasive method with comparable clinical results.
机译:这项前瞻性,随机,对照试验的目的是比较两种用于治疗A2,A3和C1型AO老年患者不稳定distal骨远端骨折的手术技术的结果。患者使用固定角度的掌侧钢板或K-wire结合Kapandji和Willenegger技术进行治疗。在3、6和12个月后确定功能结果。我们纳入了40名65岁以上的患者。 21例接受钢板固定治疗,19例接受K线固定治疗。一年后,两个治疗组的功能结果几乎相同,表明这两种方法均适合于治疗老年患者的AO型A2,A3和C1型不稳定的distal骨远端骨折。根据Castaing评分,在21例钢板固定患者中有16例在19例K线固定患者中有17例表现良好。一年后,两组的DASH中位数均为3。固定板的患者能够在4周前恢复日常生活。最常见的并发症是创伤后中位神经刺激。两种方法均适用于治疗A2,A3和C1型AO远端unstable骨不稳定骨折的老年患者。如果早期的术后术后护理很重要,则手掌固定角钢板固定是理想的治疗方法。否则,克氏针固定术是一种有效的,微创的方法,具有可比的临床效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号