...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume >Biomechanical evaluation of the Pulvertaft versus the 'wrap around' tendon suture technique
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of the Pulvertaft versus the 'wrap around' tendon suture technique

机译:Pulvertaft与“环绕式”肌腱缝合技术的生物力学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a novel wrap around tendon repair method with those of the standard Pulvertaft technique used for tendon reconstructions. Seventy-two porcine extensor tendons were used to create 36 reconstructions in six sets of six repairs, each using one of the two surgical techniques with differing lengths of the reconstructions. All the reconstructions were tested in vitro by cyclic tensile loading, resulting in the time-zero strength. When only the size of the repair and the strength were compared, and length of the reconstruction was not taken in consideration, the 'wrap around' reconstructions were of similar strength but less bulky than the Pulvertaft repairs. In conclusion, the 'wrap around' technique gives a thinner reconstruction which is as strong as, or stronger than the Pulvertaft technique, depending on the amount of weaves.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较一种新型的缠绕肌腱修复方法的生物力学性能与用于肌腱重建的标准Pulvertaft技术的生物力学性能。使用七十二只猪伸肌腱在六组修复物中进行六组修复,每组使用两种手术技术中的一种,以不同的修复长度进行36次修复。所有的重建都在体外通过循环拉伸载荷进行了测试,得出了零时强度。当仅比较修复的大小和强度,并且不考虑重建的长度时,“环绕”重建的强度相似,但体积不如Pulvertaft修复。总之,根据组织的数量,“环绕”技术可提供比Pulvertaft技术更强或更薄的重构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号