...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of knee surgery >Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques
【24h】

Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques

机译:缝合锚杆的生物力学评价与透晶隧道髌骨肌腱修复技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study is to compare the cyclic loading strength and ultimate failure load in suture anchor repair versus transosseous tunnel repair of patellar tendons using a cadaver model. Twelve cadaveric patella specimens were used (six matched pairs). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were performed to ensure equal bone quality among groups. All right knees were assigned to the suture anchor repair group ( n = 6), whereas all left knees were assigned to the transosseous bone tunnel group ( n = 6). Suture type and repair configuration were equivalent. After the respective procedures were performed, each patella was mounted into a gripping jig. Tensile load was applied at a rate of 1 Hz between magnitudes of 50 and 150 N, 50 and 200 N, 50 and 250 N, and tensile load at a rate of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Failure was defined as a sharp deviation in the linear load versus displacement curve, and failure mode was recorded. DXA measurements demonstrated equivalence of bone quality between the two groups ( p > 0.05). During cyclic load testing, there was only a statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to cyclic loading at the 50 to 200 N loading cycle ( p = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to ultimate load to failure ( p = 0.43). Failure mode within the suture anchor cohort occurred through anchor pullout except for one, which failed through the tendon. All specimens within the transosseous cohort failed through the midsubstance of the tendon except for one, which failed through suture breakage. Suture anchor repair demonstrated a similar biomechanical profile regarding cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure when compared with "gold standard" transosseous tunnel patellar tendon repair with a trend toward less gapping in the suture anchor group. Using suture anchors for repair of the patella tendon has similar biomechanical properties to transpatellar tunnels but may provide other clinical advantages.
机译:本研究的目的是使用尸体模型比较缝合锚固修复中的循环加载强度和终极故障载荷与髌骨筋的透镜隧道修复。使用了12个尸体髌骨标本(六双匹配)。进行双能X射线吸收度(DXA)测量以确保组之间的等于骨质。将所有右膝盖分配给缝合线锚固修复组(n = 6),而所有左膝关节被分配给传式骨隧道组(n = 6)。缝合型和修复配置等同。在进行各个程序后,将每个髌骨安装成夹持夹具。在50和150N,50n,50n,50n,50和250n,50和250n,50和250n,50℃的速率之间以1 hz的速率施加拉伸载荷,并且以0.1mm / s的速率直至失效。失败被定义为线性载荷与位移曲线的急剧偏差,并记录故障模式。 DXA测量显示两组之间的骨质等对等的等值(P> 0.05)。在循环负载测试期间,在50至200N加载周期的循环负载方面只有统计学上显着的差异(P = 0.010)。对于最终负荷失效,组之间没有统计学上显着的差异(P = 0.43)。除了通过肌腱失败之外,缝合锚群组内的故障模式通过锚拔出而发生。传统核心内的所有标本都通过肌腱的中间失调,除了通过缝合破损失败。缝合锚修复证明了与缝合锚杆势较少拉伸的趋势相比,在与“金标准”传递隧道髌骨竞技队相比,有关循环加载和最终负载的类似生物力学概况。使用缝线锚固髌骨腱具有类似的生物力学特性,可以提供其他临床优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号