首页> 外文期刊>The Japanese journal of antibiotics >Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery
【24h】

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery

机译:手术中的抗生素预防

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is widely performed in any surgical procedures to prevent postoperative infections. However, we have neither double-blind placebo-controlled studies nor sufficient surveillance of postoperative infections that are common in Europe and the United States, and therefore there is little convincing scientific basis accounting for the validity of this therapy. In addition, prophylactic agent is still uncovered by medical insurance despite the persistent arguments as to its necessity. To establish the guidelines in our own country, a greater deal of evidence needs to be accumulated. Strategies for antimicrobial prophylaxis should be determined based on the types of possible postoperative infections and the classifications of operations according to contamination levels in individual operative fields. This process may involve the precise selection of prophylactic agents for suspected contaminating bacterial species in each operative organ and their administration regimens suitable forthe individual surgery. Upon selection of prophylactic agents for postoperative infections, various conditions should be considered: e.g., susceptibility, resistance, blood concentrations, urinary excretion, transition into body fluid and tissues, and adverse reactions. The first and second generations of cephem and cephamycin derivatives can be the first choice, but the use of various other antibacterial agents may be necessary for resistant bacterial strains such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP). Cyclic therapy based on penicillins (including mixtures), cephems (including cephamycins) and phosphomycins also seems useful for such resistant strains. At present, there is only limited evidence supporting the importance of prophylactic agents. Controlled trials employing well-designed protocols that endure scientific criticism must be done with due consideration for medical economics.
机译:在任何外科手术程序中都广泛采取了抗菌预防措施,以防止术后感染。但是,我们既没有双盲安慰剂对照研究,也没有对欧美常见的术后感染进行足够的监测,因此,几乎没有令人信服的科学依据来说明这种疗法的有效性。另外,尽管对预防剂的必要性有持续的争论,但仍然没有被医疗保险发现。为了在我们自己的国家建立指导方针,需要积累更多的证据。应根据可能的术后感染类型以及根据各个手术领域中的污染水平确定手术类别,来确定抗菌药物的预防策略。该过程可能涉及为每个手术器官中的疑似污染细菌物种精确选择预防剂,并选择适合个体手术的给药方案。在选择用于术后感染的预防剂时,应考虑多种情​​况:例如易感性,抵抗力,血药浓度,尿液排泄,向体液和组织的转变以及不良反应。第一代和第二代头孢烯和头霉素衍生物可能是首选,但是对于耐药菌菌株(例如耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐青霉素的肺炎链球菌(PRSP)),可能需要使用其他多种抗菌剂。基于青霉素(包括混合物),头孢(包括头孢霉素)和磷霉素的循环疗法似乎也可用于此类耐药菌株。目前,仅有很少的证据支持预防剂的重要性。采用设计合理的方案进行科学评论的对照试验必须在考虑医学经济学的前提下进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号