首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >Falling trees, fractals, and sophistry: some philosophical 'biohazards' en route to reconciling biomedicine and homeopathy.
【24h】

Falling trees, fractals, and sophistry: some philosophical 'biohazards' en route to reconciling biomedicine and homeopathy.

机译:倒下的树木,分形和诡辩:在协调生物医学和顺势疗法的过程中出现了一些哲学上的“生物危害”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Reconciling biomedical science and homeopathy might usefully begin by examining their various observational stances. This depends significantly on preconceptions about the nature of reality (e.g., whether it exists externally, independent of observers, or whether it is to some extent correlated nondeterministically with observation). METHODS: Based on known observables, a rudimentary fractal model of the universe is proposed consisting of a series of self-similar integrated levels of reality, or "wholes" contained one within another like a set of Russian dolls. This model suggests possible contextualization of homeopathy and biomedicine's observational stances. RESULTS: The fractal model bears compelling similarities to the ancient Hermetic tradition encapsulated in the phrase, "As above; so below." In the context of this model, homeopathy's observational stance includes a multidimensional range of symptoms from across several "levels of wholeness." In contrast, biomedicine's stance corresponds to exclusive observation of separate symptoms, each originating from one physical level of reality. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic reconciliation of these two viewpoints is possible if it is realized that they are not contradictory but complementary; that each has its place in the therapeutic scheme of things, and that it should be possible to move freely between each type of observational stance as the patient's circumstances dictate.
机译:简介:调和生物医学和顺势疗法可能会从检查它们的各种观察立场开始。这在很大程度上取决于对现实本质的先入之见(例如,它是否存在于外部,独立于观察者,还是在某种程度上与观察不确定地相关)。方法:基于已知的可观察性,提出了一个基本的宇宙分形模型,该模型由一系列自相似的,一体的现实水平组成,或者说“整体”包含在彼此之间,就像一组俄罗斯玩偶一样。该模型表明顺势疗法和生物医学的观察立场可能存在关联。结果:分形模型与封装在“如上;如故”中的古代Hermetic传统具有令人信服的相似性。在这种模型的背景下,顺势疗法的观察立场包括来自多个“整体水平”的多维症状范围。相反,生物医学的立场对应于对单独症状的排他性观察,每种症状都源于现实的一个物理水平。结论:如果意识到这两种观点不是矛盾的而是互补的,那么这两种观点的语用和解是可能的。每个事物在事物的治疗方案中都有自己的位置,并且应该有可能根据患者的情况在每种观察立场之间自由移动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号