...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >Review of cochrane reviews on acupuncture: How chinese resources contribute to cochrane reviews
【24h】

Review of cochrane reviews on acupuncture: How chinese resources contribute to cochrane reviews

机译:针灸对Cochrane评价的评论:中国资源如何促进Cochrane评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Cochrane Systematic Reviews (CSRs) are frequently referenced by acupuncture efficacy studies currently. In this study, the CSRs on acupuncture are reviewed, and the disease fields they covered and the conclusions they reached are analyzed. In order to explore the potential contribution to CSRs by Chinese resources, the authors analyzed whether the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, and the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials would affect the positive conclusion ratios of the CSRs. Methods: Acupuncture-related CSRs in the Cochrane Library were searched and classified based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10). The CSRs were further designated as positive or negative according to the conclusion statements. CSRs with the participation of Chinese reviewers, the utilization of Chinese databases, or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials were extracted, and the positive ratios of conclusions were compared separately with corresponding CSRs without those three Chinese resources. Results: Thirty-two (32) CSRs were identified, 9 (28.1%) of which reached positive conclusions. The CSRs with positive conclusions were mainly about multifarious pains, nausea and vomiting, and functional disorders. Seventeen (17; 53.1%) included the participation of Chinese reviewers, 18 (56.3%) involved the utilization of Chinese databases, and 20 (62.5%) included Chinese clinical trials. No differences on the positive conclusion ratios were observed between CSRs with reviewers from Chinese institutions and those that did not (odds ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06, 1.62), the utilization of Chinese databases and those that did not (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11, 2.44), or the inclusion of Chinese clinical trials and those that did not (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.26, 6.49). Conclusions: Most CSRs on acupuncture are inconclusive. No significant differences regarding the positive conclusion ratios were found between the CSRs with or without the utilization of Chinese resources.
机译:背景:目前,针灸疗效研究经常引用Cochrane系统评价(CSR)。在这项研究中,对针灸的CSR进行了回顾,并分析了它们涵盖的疾病领域以及得出的结论。为了探究中国资源对企业社会责任的潜在贡献,作者分析了中国评论者的参与,中文数据库的利用以及中国临床试验的纳入是否会影响企业社会责任的肯定结论率。方法:根据国际疾病分类10(ICD-10)对Cochrane图书馆中与针灸相关的CSR进行搜索和分类。根据结论声明,企业社会责任被进一步确定为正面或负面。提取有中国评论者参与,使用中文数据库或纳入中国临床试验的CSR,并将结论的肯定比率与没有这三种中文资源的相应CSR分别进行比较。结果:鉴定出三十二(32)个CSR,其中9个(28.1%)得出了肯定的结论。得出肯定结论的CSR主要涉及多种疼痛,恶心和呕吐以及功能障碍。 17名(17; 53.1%)包括中国评论者,18名(56.3%)包括中文数据库的使用,20名(62.5%)包括中国临床试验。来自中国机构的评审员与没有来自中国机构的评审员之间的肯定结论率没有差异(赔率[OR]:0.32,95%置信区间[CI]:0.06,1.62),中文数据库的使用率和否(OR:0.51,95%CI:0.11,2.44),或纳入中国临床试验和未纳入的中国临床试验(OR:1.29,95%CI:0.26,6.49)。结论:大多数针灸CSR尚无定论。在使用或不使用中国资源的情况下,企业社会责任之间的积极结论比率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号