首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo.
【24h】

Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo.

机译:治疗急性鼻鼻窦炎:比较糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂,阿莫西林和安慰剂的疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intranasal corticosteroids used with antibiotics are known to improve rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with antibiotic therapy alone. However, the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid monotherapy for acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis is not established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) versus amoxicillin and placebo in patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects (> or =12 years; N = 981) were randomized to MFNS 200 microg once daily or twice daily for 15 days, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, or respective placebo. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean am/pm major symptom score over the treatment phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total symptom score. Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily was significantly superior to placebo (P < .001) and amoxicillin (P = .002) at improving major symptom score. Starting on day 2, MFNS 200 microg twice daily improved total symptom score throughout treatment versus amoxicillin (P = .012) and placebo (P < .001). Global response to treatment was significantly greater with MFNS 200 microg twice daily versus amoxicillin (P = .013) and placebo (P = .001). Although significantly superior to placebo, MFNS 200 microg once daily was not superior to amoxicillin for the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, MFNS 200 microg twice daily produced significant symptom improvements versus amoxicillin and placebo, without predisposing the patient to disease recurrence or bacterial infection.
机译:背景:与单独使用抗生素相比,鼻内使用皮质类固醇激素可改善鼻-鼻窦炎的症状。然而,鼻内皮质类固醇单一疗法对急性,简单的鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效尚未确立。目的:评估糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂(MFNS)相对于阿莫西林和安慰剂在急性并发鼻-鼻窦炎患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项双盲,双模拟试验中,受试者(>或= 12岁; N = 981)被随机分配至MFNS 200微克,每日一次或每天两次,共15天,阿莫西林500 mg,每日3次,共10天,或相应的安慰剂。随访14天。主要功效终点是整个治疗阶段的平均am / pm主要症状评分。次要疗效终点包括总症状评分。安全性评估包括随访期间的疾病复发和不良事件监测。结果:糠酸莫米松鼻腔喷雾200 mg每天两次,在改善主要症状评分方面显着优于安慰剂(P <.001)和阿莫西林(P = .002)。从第2天开始,与阿莫西林(P = .012)和安慰剂(P <.001)相比,整个治疗过程中每天两次两次MFNS 200微克改善了总症状评分。与阿莫西林(P = .013)和安慰剂(P = .001)相比,每日两次两次MFNS 200 microg对治疗的总体反应明显更高。尽管显着优于安慰剂,但每天一次200微克的MFNS在主要或次要疗效终点方面并不优于阿莫西林。所有治疗均耐受良好,不良事件发生率相似。结论:在急性,简单的鼻-鼻窦炎患者中,每天两次两次200微克的MFNS与阿莫西林和安慰剂相比可显着改善症状,而又不使患者容易复发或感染细菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号