...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo.
【24h】

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo.

机译:耐受β2-激动剂的支气管保护作用:沙丁胺醇的对映体与外消旋沙丁胺醇和安慰剂的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Regular use of racemic salbutamol results in the partial loss of its bronchoprotective effect. The 2 enantiomers of salbutamol, the bronchodilator R-salbutamol and nonbronchodilator S-salbutamol, are now available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of regular use of S-salbutamol, R-salbutamol, racemic salbutamol, and placebo on the bronchoprotective effect of a single dose of racemic salbutamol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODS: Eleven of 13 well-controlled beta2 -agonist-free asthmatic subjects completed a double-blind, randomized study comparing racemic salbutamol 2.5 mg, S-salbutamol 1. 25 mg, R-salbutamol 1.25 mg, and diluent placebo nebulized and inhaled 3 times daily for 6 days (>/=6-day washout period). Ten to 12 hours after the last dose, the subjects performed measurement of FEV1, methacholine PC20, and a repeat methacholine PC20 done 1 hour after the first methacholine test and 10 minutes after 2 puffs (200 microgram) of racemic salbutamol administered from a metered-dose inhaler. The primary endpoint was the methacholine PC20 dose shift (Deltalog PC20/log 2) from before to after administration of 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol. RESULTS: The methacholine dose shift was 3.2 doubling doses (9-fold increase in methacholine PC20 after 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol) during the placebo treatment and was unaltered (3.2) after administration of S-salbutamol. The dose shift was significantly lower after both the R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol treatments (2.2 and 2.6 doubling doses, respectively); there was no significant difference between R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol. There was no treatment effect on baseline FEV1, baseline methacholine PC20, or bronchodilation. CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with racemic salbutamol or R-salbutamol, but not S-salbutamol, results in a partial loss of bronchoprotection, without loss of bronchodilation, compared with placebo.
机译:背景:外消旋沙丁胺醇的常规使用导致其支气管保护作用的部分丧失。沙丁胺醇的两种对映异构体,支气管扩张剂R-沙丁胺醇和非支气管扩张剂S-沙丁胺醇现已上市。目的:我们试图比较常规使用S-沙丁胺醇,R-沙丁胺醇,外消旋沙丁胺醇和安慰剂对单剂量外消旋沙丁胺醇对乙酰甲胆碱引起的支气管收缩的支气管保护作用。方法:13名控制良好的无β2受体激动剂的哮喘受试者中,有11名完成了一项双盲,随机研究,比较了消旋的沙丁胺醇2.5 mg,S-沙丁胺醇1、25 mg,R-沙丁胺醇1.25 mg和喷雾和吸入稀释剂3的安慰剂。每天6次(> / = 6天清除期)。在最后一次给药后10到12小时,受试者进行了FEV1,乙酰甲胆碱PC20的测定,并在第一次乙酰甲胆碱测试后1小时和2泡(200微克)消旋沙丁胺醇给药2口后10分钟进行了重复的乙酰甲胆碱PC20测量。剂量吸入器。主要终点是从服用200微克消旋沙丁胺醇之前到之后的乙酰甲胆碱PC20剂量变化(Deltalog PC20 / log 2)。结果:在安慰剂治疗期间,乙酰甲胆碱的剂量变化为3.2倍剂量(在200微克外消旋沙丁胺醇后,乙酰甲胆碱PC20增加9倍),在给予S-沙丁胺醇后未发生改变(3.2)。 R-沙丁胺醇和消旋沙丁胺醇治疗后的剂量变化显着降低(分别为2.2和2.6倍剂量); R-沙丁胺醇与外消旋沙丁胺醇之间无显着差异。对基线FEV1,基线乙酰甲胆碱PC20或支气管扩张没有治疗作用。结论:与安慰剂相比,常规用外消旋沙丁胺醇或R-沙丁胺醇而不是S-沙丁胺醇治疗可导致支气管保护功能部分丧失,而没有支气管扩张作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号