...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Celery allergy confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge: a clinical study in 32 subjects with a history of adverse reactions to celery root.
【24h】

Celery allergy confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge: a clinical study in 32 subjects with a history of adverse reactions to celery root.

机译:通过双盲,安慰剂控制的食物挑战证实了芹菜过敏:这是一项对32位有芹菜根不良反应史的受试者进行的临床研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Celery root is a frequent cause of food allergy in pollen-sensitized patients. Because of problems in blinding challenges with fresh vegetables and the risk of anaphylactic reactions, no double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs) with celery have been published so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical relevance of celery as a food allergen by DBPCFCs and to evaluate current diagnostic procedures in patients with true allergy. METHODS: DBPCFCs were performed in 32 patients with a history of an allergic reaction to celery. The patients underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with celery extracts, crude celery, and different pollen extracts. Specific IgE for celery was determined by using the CAP method. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 32 patients had a positive DBPCFC result. Two patients reacted to placebo, and 8 patients did not respond to the challenge. Of the nonresponders, 4 reacted to an open provocation with celery. The sensitivity of CAP determination for specific IgE (> or =0.7 kU/L) to celery in patients with a positive DBPCFC result was 73%, 48% to 86% for SPTs (> or =3 mm) with commercial extracts, and 96% for prick-to-prick tests with crude celery. The positive predictive value of the SPT and CAP tests was between 87% and 96%, whereas the specificity and negative predictive values were poor. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of celery as a food allergen for use in DBPCFCs. The SPT and CAP methods proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of a relevant allergy to celery in regard to sensitivity and positive predictive value but not to specificity and negative predictive value.
机译:背景:芹菜根是花粉致敏患者食物过敏的常见原因。由于新鲜蔬菜致盲的问题以及过敏反应的风险,迄今为止,尚未发表关于芹菜的双盲,安慰剂对照食品挑战(DBPCFC)。目的:本研究旨在确认DBPCFCs将芹菜作为食物过敏原的临床相关性,并评估目前对真正过敏患者的诊断程序。方法:对32例有芹菜过敏反应史的患者进行了DBPCFCs治疗。患者接受芹菜提取物,粗芹菜和不同花粉提取物的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。通过使用CAP方法确定芹菜的特异性IgE。结果:32例患者中有22例DBPCFC结果阳性。两名患者对安慰剂有反应,而八名患者未对此挑战做出反应。在无反应者中,有4人对芹菜进行公开挑衅。对于DBPCFC结果阳性的患者,对于特定IgE(>或= 0.7 kU / L)的芹菜,CAP测定的敏感性为73%,对于具有商业提取物的SPT(>或= 3 mm),其敏感性为48%至86% %用于粗制芹菜的点刺试验。 SPT和CAP测试的阳性预测值在87%至96%之间,而特异性和阴性预测值则较差。结论:本研究证实了芹菜作为DBPCFCs中食物过敏原的重要性。 SPT和CAP方法被证明对于诊断芹菜相关的过敏性,敏感性和阳性预测值,但对特异性和阴性预测值不可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号