首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Effect of montelukast for treatment of asthma in cigarette smokers
【24h】

Effect of montelukast for treatment of asthma in cigarette smokers

机译:孟鲁司特对吸烟者哮喘的治疗作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Many asthmatic patients are unable to quit cigarettes; therefore information is needed on treatment options for smokers. This study evaluates 10 mg/d montelukast and 250 ??g of fluticasone propionate twice daily, each compared with placebo, in patients with self-reported active smoking (unable to quit) and asthma. Methods: Patients (ages 18-55 years, with asthma [??1 year], FEV1 of 60% to 90% of predicted value, airway reversibility [??12%], and self-reported active smoking [??0.5 to ??2 packs per day]) were randomized (after a 3-week, single-blind, placebo, run-in period) to 1 of 3 parallel, 6-month, double-blind treatment arms. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of days with asthma control during treatment. Adverse experiences (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: There were 347, 336, and 336 patients randomized to montelukast, fluticasone, and placebo, respectively. The mean percentage of days with asthma control over 6 months of treatment was 45% (montelukast, P .05 vs placebo), 49% (fluticasone, P .001 vs placebo), and 39% (placebo); the difference between montelukast and fluticasone was not significant (P = .14). Patients with a smoking history of ??11 pack years (the median value) tended to show more benefit with fluticasone, whereas those with a smoking history of 11 pack years tended to show more benefit with montelukast. AEs occurred in similar proportions among treatment groups. Conclusions: In a population of asthmatic patients actively smoking cigarettes, both 10 mg/d montelukast and 250 ??g of fluticasone propionate twice daily significantly increased the mean percentage of days with asthma control compared with placebo. ? 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
机译:目的:许多哮喘患者无法戒烟;因此,需要有关吸烟者治疗选择的信息。这项研究对自我报告为主动吸烟(无法戒烟)和哮喘的患者,每天两次评估10 mg / d孟鲁司特和250μg氟替卡松丙酸酯,每次与安慰剂比较。方法:患者(年龄18-55岁,患有哮喘[?1年],FEV1为预测值的60%至90%,气道可逆性[?12%]和自我报告的主动吸烟[?0.5至每天2包])(在3周,单盲,安慰剂,磨合期后)随机分配到3个平行,6个月,双盲治疗组中的1个。主要功效终点是治疗期间接受哮喘控制的天数百分比。还评估了不良经历(AE)。结果:分别有347、336和336例患者随机分为孟鲁司特,氟替卡松和安慰剂。治疗6个月内控制哮喘的平均天数分别为45%(孟鲁司特,P <.05 vs安慰剂),49%(氟替卡松,P <.001 vs.安慰剂)和39%(安慰剂);孟鲁司特和氟替卡松之间的差异不显着(P = .14)。吸烟史为11包年(中值)的患者倾向于使用氟替卡松显示更多的获益,而吸烟史> 11包年的患者倾向于使用孟鲁司特显示更多的获益。在各治疗组中,AE发生的比例相似。结论:在大量积极抽烟的哮喘患者中,与安慰剂相比,每天两次10 mg / d孟鲁司特和250 mg丙酸氟替卡松均显着增加了哮喘控制的平均天数。 ? 2013年美国过敏,哮喘和免疫学学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号