首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine >Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking.
【24h】

Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking.

机译:实验室任务中的青少年风险偏好与冒险行为行为之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to assess individual differences among adolescents regarding risk-taking behavior in the laboratory. The second aim was to evaluate whether the laboratory-based risk-taking behavior is associated with other behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. METHODS: A total of 82 adolescents with no personal history of psychiatric disorder completed a computerized decision-making task, the Wheel of Fortune. On the basis of the choices made between clearly defined probabilities and real monetary outcomes, this task assesses risk preferences when participants are confronted with potential rewards and losses. The participants also completed a variety of behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. RESULTS: Performance on the task varied on the basis of probability and anticipated outcomes. In the winning sub-task, participants selected low-probability-high-magnitude reward (high-risk choice) less frequently than high-probability-low-magnitude reward (low-risk choice). In the losing sub-task, participants selected low-probability-high-magnitude loss more often than high-probability-low-magnitude loss. On average, the selection of probabilistic rewards was optimal and similar to performance in adults. There were, however, individual differences in performance, and one-third of the adolescents made high-risk choice more frequently than low-risk choice while selecting a reward. After controlling for sociodemographic and psychological variables, high-risk choice on the winning task predicted "real-world" risk-taking behavior and substance-related problems. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight individual differences in risk-taking behavior. Regarding validity of the Wheel of Fortune task, the preliminary data suggest that it might be a valuable laboratory tool for studying behavioral and neurobiological processes associated with risk-taking behavior in adolescents.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估青少年在实验室中关于冒险行为的个体差异。第二个目的是评估基于实验室的冒险行为是否与与冒险行为相关的其他行为和心理测度相关。方法:共有82名没有精神病史的青少年完成了计算机化的决策任务,即命运之轮。根据在明确定义的概率和实际货币结果之间做出的选择,当参与者面临潜在的回报和损失时,此任务将评估风险偏好。参与者还完成了与冒险行为相关的各种行为和心理措施。结果:任务的执行情况根据概率和预期结果而有所不同。在获胜的子任务中,参与者选择高概率低幅度奖励(高风险选择)的频率要比高概率低幅度奖励(低风险选择)的频率低。在失败的子任务中,与高概率低幅度损失相比,参与者更多地选择了低概率高幅度损失。平均而言,概率奖励的选择是最佳的,与成人的表现相似。但是,在表现上存在个体差异,并且在选择奖励时,三分之一的青少年比低风险的选择更频繁地选择高风险的选择。在控制了社会人口统计学和心理变量之后,获胜任务的高风险选择预测了“现实世界”的冒险行为和与物质有关的问题。结论:这些发现强调了冒险行为的个体差异。关于“命运之轮”任务的有效性,初步数据表明它可能是研究与青少年冒险行为相关的行为和神经生物学过程的有价值的实验室工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号