首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth.
【24h】

Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth.

机译:人,牛和猪牙齿与牙釉质和牙本质的微拉伸强度比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine the bond strengths promoted by an adhesive system to human, bovine, and porcine enamel and dentin, and compare their etched micromorphology by scanning electron microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty sound freshly extracted teeth were used in this study: ten human third molars, ten bovine incisors, and ten porcine molars. The crowns of human (H), bovine (B), and porcine (P) teeth were ground with 600-grit SiC paper to expose either enamel (E) or mid-depth dentin (D) surfaces. After application of the adhesive resin, composite crowns approximately 8 mm high were built up with TPH Spectrum composite. After 24 h of water storage, specimens were serially sectioned in the buccal-lingual direction to obtain 0.8 mm slabs, which were trimmed to an hourglass shape of approximately 0.8 mm2 at the bonded interface. Specimens were tested in tension in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test at the 95% confidence level. RESULTS: Tukey's test showed significant differences between bond strengths obtained on enamel and dentin (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in microTBS between human, bovine, and porcine teeth. SEM observations revealed a similar dentinal morphology for the three species. However, porcine enamel specimens presented a very different distribution of enamel prisms. CONCLUSION: Bovine teeth proved to be possible substitutes for human teeth in either dentin or enamel bond testing. However, even though porcine teeth provided enamel and dentin bond strengths similar to human and bovine teeth, enamel morphology presented a very different configuration.
机译:目的:确定由粘合剂体系促进的对人,牛和猪的牙釉质和牙本质的粘合强度,并通过扫描电子显微镜比较其蚀刻后的微观形态。材料与方法:本研究使用了三十颗刚拔出的健全牙齿:十个人类第三磨牙,十个牛切牙和十个猪磨牙。将人(H),牛(B)和猪(P)的牙冠用600粒度的SiC纸研磨,以暴露牙釉质(E)或中深度牙本质(D)的表面。涂上粘性树脂后,用TPH Spectrum复合材料建立大约8毫米高的复合材料胎冠。储水24小时后,沿颊舌方向连续切片,以获得0.8 mm的平板,将其在粘合界面处修整为约0.8 mm2的沙漏形状。在万能试验机(0.5mm / min)中对样品进行张力测试。使用ANOVA和Tukey检验以95%置信水平对结果进行统计分析。结果:Tukey检验显示牙釉质和牙本质粘合强度之间存在显着差异(p <0.05)。但是,人,牛和猪牙齿之间的microTBS差异无统计学意义。 SEM观察表明,这三个物种的牙本质形态相似。但是,猪牙釉质标本呈现出非常不同的牙釉质棱柱分布。结论:在牙本质或牙釉质粘结测试中,牛牙被证明可以替代人牙。但是,尽管猪牙齿提供的牙釉质和牙本质粘合强度与人和牛牙齿相似,但牙釉质的形态却呈现出截然不同的形态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号