首页> 外文期刊>The journal for nurse practitioners: JNP >Support for NPs and PAs Sharing a Label
【24h】

Support for NPs and PAs Sharing a Label

机译:支持共享标签的NP和PA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is there 1 title by which patients and colleagues can refer to NPs and PAs? The simple answer is yes. What that title should be, however, is more complicated. The argument for separate terms reflects that our training, licensure, supervision, and oversight requirements are different. The argument for 1 inclusive term is patient-centered; when practices and roles within a setting are more similar than different, differentiation is unwarranted and can be confusing. There are differences between how we (NPs) deliver care, but it is not always the role that makes the difference. Not all NPs are holistic care providers, and not all PAs think only medically. Not all NPs have a significant RN practice history, while some PAs have extensive prior medical, nursing, or other experience. The lines are more blurry than defined.
机译:患者和同事可以使用1个标题来指代NP和PA吗?简单的答案是。但是,该标题应该更复杂。有关单独术语的论点反映出我们的培训,执照,监督和监督要求是不同的。 1个包含项的论点以患者为中心;当一个环境中的实践和角色比相似的事物多得多时,区分是不必要的,并且会造成混淆。我们(NP)提供护理的方式有所不同,但并非总是发挥作用的不同。并非所有的NP都是整体护理提供者,也不是所有的PA都只考虑医学。并非所有的NP都有重要的RN执业经历,而有些PA则具有广泛的先前医疗,护理或其他经验。线条比定义的更加模糊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号