...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunication systems: Modeling, Analysis, Design and Management >Comparison of IP-based and explicit paths for one-to-one fast reroute in MPLS networks
【24h】

Comparison of IP-based and explicit paths for one-to-one fast reroute in MPLS networks

机译:MPLS网络中一对一快速重路由的基于IP和显式路径的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Primary and backup paths in MPLS fast reroute (FRR) may be established as shortest paths according to the administrative link costs of the IP control plane, or as explicitly calculated arbitrary paths. In both cases, the path layout can be optimized so that the maximum link utilization for a specific traffic matrix and for a set of considered failure scenarios is minimized. In this paper, we propose a linear program for the optimization of the path layout for explicitly calculated paths, which can either produce single paths and route entire traffic along those paths, or generate multiple paths and spread the traffic among those paths providing load balancing. We compare the resulting lowest maximum link utilization in both cases with the lowest maximum link utilization that can be obtained by optimizing unique IP-based paths. Our results quantify the gain in resource efficiency usage provided by optimized explicit multiple paths or explicit single paths as compared to optimized IP-based paths. Furthermore, we investigate if explicit path layouts cause an increased configuration effort compared to IP-based layouts and if yes, to what extend.
机译:可以根据IP控制平面的管理链路成本,将MPLS快速重路由(FRR)中的主路径和备用路径建立为最短路径,也可以将其建立为明确计算的任意路径。在这两种情况下,都可以优化路径布局,以使特定流量矩阵和一组已考虑的故障情况的最大链路利用率降至最低。在本文中,我们提出了一个线性程序,用于优化显式计算路径的路径布局,该程序既可以生成单个路径并沿这些路径路由整个流量,也可以生成多个路径并在这些路径之间分散流量以提供负载平衡。我们将两种情况下产生的最低的最大链路利用率与可以通过优化基于IP的唯一路径获得的最低的最大链路利用率进行比较。与优化的基于IP的路径相比,我们的结果量化了优化的显式多路径或显式单路径所提供的资源效率使用的收益。此外,与基于IP的布局相比,我们调查显式路径布局是否会导致配置工作量增加,如果是,则扩展到何种程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号