...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences: le Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques >Genetic Myopathies Initially Diagnosed and Treated as Inflammatory Myopathy
【24h】

Genetic Myopathies Initially Diagnosed and Treated as Inflammatory Myopathy

机译:遗传性肌病最初被诊断和治疗为炎性肌病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: Differentiating genetic myopathies from inflammatory myopathies can be challenging because of multiple overlapping clinical features. Examples are presented to highlight important clinical features that assist in the differentiation between the two. Methods: Clinical features including age at onset, history, pattern of weakness, serum creatine kinase activity, electromyography findings, and muscle biopsies are reported in six patients initially thought to have an inflammatory myopathy in whom the final diagnosis was a genetic myopathy. Results: All six patients met Bohan and Peter criteria for at least probable idiopathic polymyositis and were subsequently found to have a genetic myopathy (4 DYSF, RYR1, and GNE). The key distinguishing clinical were minimal to no response to immunosuppression and atypical involvement of distal muscles in the majority of cases. Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with inflammatory myopathies should be reevaluated for the possibility of a genetic myopathy if they fail to respond to a course of disease-modifying agents and/or there is atypical distal muscle involvement.
机译:目的:由于多重重叠的临床特征,将遗传性肌病与炎症性肌病区分开来可能具有挑战性。提供了一些实例来突出强调有助于两者区分的重要临床特征。方法:在最初被认为患有炎性肌病的六名患者中报告了临床特征,包括发病年龄,病史,虚弱模式,血清肌酸激酶活性,肌电图检查结果和肌肉活检,最终诊断为遗传性肌病。结果:全部6例患者均符合Bohan和Peter的标准,至少可能患有特发性多发性肌炎,随后被发现患有遗传性肌病(4 DYSF,RYR1和GNE)。在大多数情况下,与众不同的关键临床表现是对免疫抑制和远端肌肉的非典型受累反应很小甚至没有反应。结论:如果诊断为炎症性肌病的患者对病程改变药物的治疗无效和/或远端肌群受累,则应重新评估遗传性肌病的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号