首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Validation of web-based, multiple 24-h recalls combined with nutritional supplement intake questionnaires against nitrogen excretions to determine protein intake in Dutch elite athletes
【24h】

Validation of web-based, multiple 24-h recalls combined with nutritional supplement intake questionnaires against nitrogen excretions to determine protein intake in Dutch elite athletes

机译:验证基于网络的多次24小时召回,结合针对氮排泄的营养补品摄入量调查表以确定荷兰精英运动员的蛋白质摄入量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Information on dietary composition is vitally important for elite athletes to optimise their performance and recovery, which requires valid tools. The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity of assessing protein intake using three web-based 24-h recalls and questionnaires, by comparing these with three urinary N excretions on the same day. A total of forty-seven Dutch elite top athletes, both disabled and non-disabled, aged between 18 and 35 years, with a BMI of 17.5-31 kg/m(2), exercising >12 h/week were recruited. Estimated mean dietary protein intake was 109.6 (sd 33.0) g/d by recalls and questionnaires v. 141.3 (sd 38.2) g/d based on N excretions in urine; the difference was 25.5 (sd 21.3) % between the methods (P<0.05). We found a reasonably good association between methods for protein intake of 0.65 (95 % CI 0.45, 0.79). On an individual level, under-reporting was larger with higher protein intakes than with lower intakes. No significant differences were found in reporting absolute differences between subcategories (sex, under-reporting, BMI, collection of recalls within a certain amount of time and using protein supplements or not). In conclusion, combined, multiple, 24-h recalls and questionnaires underestimated protein intake in these young elite athletes more than that reported for non-athlete populations. The method proved to be suitable for ranking athletes according to their protein intake as needed in epidemiological studies. On an individual level, the magnitude of underestimation was about equal for all athletes except for those with very high protein intakes.
机译:关于饮食成分的信息对于精英运动员优化其表现和恢复至关重要,这需要有效的工具。本研究的目的是通过将三个基于网络的24小时召回和问卷调查与同一天的三个尿N排泄物进行比较,以调查评估蛋白质摄入量的有效性。总共招募了四十七名荷兰的顶尖运动员,包括残疾人和非残疾人,年龄在18至35岁之间,其BMI为17.5-31 kg / m(2),每周运动> 12 h。召回和问卷调查估计的平均饮食蛋白质摄入量为109.6(sd 33.0)g / d,根据尿中N的排泄量为141.3(sd 38.2)g / d;两种方法之间的差异为25.5(sd 21.3)%(P <0.05)。我们发现蛋白质摄取方法之间的合理良好关联为0.65(95%CI 0.45,0.79)。在个人层面上,蛋白质摄入量较高的情况下,摄入不足的情况要多于摄入不足的情况。在报告子类别之间的绝对差异(性别,报告不足,BMI,在一定时间内收集召回和是否使用蛋白质补充剂)之间没有发现显着差异。总而言之,与24小时的多次召回和问卷调查相结合,低估了这些年轻的精英运动员的蛋白质摄入量,这要比非运动员群体所报道的要低。该方法被证明适合根据流行病学研究中所需的蛋白质摄入量对运动员进行排名。在个体层面上,除了蛋白质摄入量很高的运动员以外,所有运动员的低估幅度都差不多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号