【24h】

Our first experience of an ethics committee:entering the Dragon's Den

机译:我们第一次参加道德委员会的经历:进入龙穴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A recent editorial in the BMJ proposes that undergraduate researchers face significant barriers in the form of ethics and NHS research governance approval procedures which are bureaucratic, excessive, and de-motivating.1 As medical students who had to negotiate the system for our Primary Healthcare intercalated BSc2 this academic year, we could not agree more. In addition to the unnecessary red-tape involved, our very first experiences of the procedure were frankly distressing and demoralising. Our account should serve as a timely reminder of why fledgling researchers may be put off in pursuing their interests in fields which are already starting to suffer.
机译:BMJ最近的一篇社论提出,本科生研究人员面临着道德和NHS研究治理批准程序形式的重大障碍,这是官僚,过度和消极的动机。1作为医学生,他们必须为我们的基本医疗保健系统进行谈判BSc2这个学年,我们不能同意。除了涉及不必要的繁文ta节,坦率地说,我们对该程序的最初经验令人沮丧和士气低落。我们的叙述应该及时提醒我们,为什么刚起步的研究人员在已经开始受到影响的领域追求他们的利益时可能会被推迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号