首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Impact on antibiotic prescription of rapid antigen detection testing in acute pharyngitis in adults: a randomised clinical trial.
【24h】

Impact on antibiotic prescription of rapid antigen detection testing in acute pharyngitis in adults: a randomised clinical trial.

机译:成人急性咽炎中快速抗原检测测试对抗生素处方的影响:一项随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Acute pharyngitis is one of the most frequent reasons for a GP consultation, and in most cases an antibiotic is prescribed. AIM: To determine the impact of rapid antigen detection testing (RADT) to identify group A beta haemolytic streptococcus in acute pharyngitis on the utilisation of antibiotics and appropriateness of their use. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain. METHOD: Patients with acute pharyngitis aged 14 years or older with at least one Centor criterion (fever, tonsillar exudate, tender enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes, or absence of cough) were recruited. Participant physicians were randomly assigned to one of two study arms: an intervention group (assigned to RADT) and a control group (following usual care, without RADT). RESULTS: Of the 557 adults enrolled, 543 could be evaluated for analysis (281 [51.7%] in the intervention group and 262 [48.3%] in the control group). GPs without access to RADT were more likely to prescribe antibiotics compared with those who performed rapid tests (64.1% versus 43.8%, P<0.001). The more Centor criteria the patients presented, the greater the number of antibiotics prescribed, regardless of whether RADT was available (P<0.001). Antibiotics were prescribed in 30.7% of the cases with negative RADT results. Inappropriate antibiotic prescription was observed in 226 cases (43%), and was significantly greater in the control than in the intervention group (60% versus 26.9%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Even though more than 30% of negative RADT results resulted in antibiotic prescribing, the study findings support the use of RADT in the consultation. This strategy has an important impact on reducing antibiotic prescription among adults with acute pharyngitis.
机译:背景:急性咽炎是进行GP咨询的最常见原因之一,在大多数情况下,需要开抗生素。目的:确定快速抗原检测测试(RADT)以确定急性咽炎中的A组β溶血性链球菌对抗生素的利用及其使用的适当性的影响。设计与地点:西班牙加泰罗尼亚的初级保健中心的整群随机对照试验。方法:招募年龄在14岁或以上且至少具有一项Centor标准(发热,扁桃体渗出液,前颈淋巴结肿大或无咳嗽)的急性咽炎患者。参加医师被随机分配到两个研究小组之一:一个干预组(分配给RADT)和一个对照组(遵循常规护理,不使用RADT)。结果:在557名成年人中,有543名可以进行分析评估(干预组为281 [51.7%],对照组为262 [48.3%])。与进行快速检测的人相比,未使用RADT的全科医生更可能开抗生素(64.1%对43.8%,P <0.001)。不管RADT是否可用,患者提出的Centor标准越多,处方的抗生素数量就越多(P <0.001)。 RADT结果阴性的病例中,有30.7%的患者开了抗生素。在226例患者中观察到不适当的抗生素处方(43%),并且在对照组中明显大于干预组(60%比26.9%; P <0.001)。结论:即使超过30%的RADT阴性结果导致开出了抗生素处方,该研究结果仍支持在咨询中使用RADT。该策略对减少成人急性咽炎的抗生素处方有重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号