首页> 外文期刊>The heart surgery forum >Efficacy of cut-and-sew box isolation of the posterior left atrium for treatment of atrial fibrillation-long-term follow-up after a modified maze procedure.
【24h】

Efficacy of cut-and-sew box isolation of the posterior left atrium for treatment of atrial fibrillation-long-term follow-up after a modified maze procedure.

机译:改良后的迷宫手术后,左后房的针线盒隔离治疗房颤的长期疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Box isolation of the posterior left atrium is one surgical or catheter ablative approach for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). In such cases, incomplete transmurality or recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after the application of various ablative techniques is considered the main reason for the recurrence of postprocedural arrhythmia. The use of solely cut-and-sew box isolation does not have these disadvantages and therefore demonstrates maximum efficacy for this therapeutic approach.We treated 15 patients with both an indication for open heart surgery and AF (2 paroxysmal, 6 short persistent [<12 months], and 7 long persistent [>12 months] cases) with a solely cut-and-sew box lesion. These patients were then retrospectively followed up over the long term with respect to the end point of freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmias >30 seconds.The median follow-up duration was 42 months (range, 32-84 months). Five (63%) of 8 patients with preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF had no arrhythmia recurrence, whereas arrhythmia recurrence was documented in all 7 patients with preoperative long persistent AF.Despite reliable transmural isolation with cut-and-sew lesions, we observed long-term arrhythmia recurrence in patients who had preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF, suggesting that therapy approaches that are more complex than box isolation might be needed for selected patients to achieve long-term stable sinus rhythm, despite the initially paroxysmal or short persistent character of the arrhythmia. A high rate of recurrence in patients with severe structural heart disease and preoperative long persistent AF might indicate that, in general, isolation of the left posterior atrium alone is not an adequate therapeutic approach for these patients.
机译:左后房的盒式隔离是一种治疗房颤(AF)的手术或导管消融方法。在这种情况下,应用各种消融技术后透壁性不完全或肺静脉传导恢复被认为是术后心律失常复发的主要原因。单独使用缝合线盒隔离术没有这些缺点,因此证明了这种治疗方法的最大功效。我们治疗了15例同时接受开胸手术和AF指征的患者(2阵发性发作,6短暂持续[<12个月],以及7例长期持续性[> 12个月]病例,且仅具有切开缝合的盒子病变。然后对这些患者进行长期随访,以了解其心律失常的自由度> 30秒的终点。中位随访时间为42个月(范围32-84个月)。术前阵发性或短暂持续性房颤的8例患者中有5例(63%)无心律失常复发,而术前长期持续性AF的所有7例患者均记录有心律失常复发。阵发性阵发性或短期持续性房颤患者的远期心律失常复发,提示尽管长期以来发作性阵发性或短期持续性特征,某些患者仍可能需要比盒子隔离更复杂的治疗方法以实现长期稳定的窦性心律心律失常。患有严重结构性心脏病和术前长期持续性房颤的患者高复发率可能表明,一般而言,仅分离左后房并不适合这些患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号