首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of cardiology >A Critical Perspective on the Role of Catheter Ablation in Management of Atrial Fibrillation
【24h】

A Critical Perspective on the Role of Catheter Ablation in Management of Atrial Fibrillation

机译:导管消融在房颤管理中的作用的批判性观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a procedural treatment option that has yet to find its final place in AF rhythm management. So far, other than pulmonary vein isolation, it does not have an indisputable mechanistic basis. It is empirical, not truly individualized on the basis of a diagnostic procedure. Success for the procedure is usually couched in terms of a measure of recurrence of AF. Existing data concerning recurrence have several confounders. Recurrence data are often subjective: They are based on surveys and symptoms rather than objective electrocardiogram (ECG) determination of recurrence, patients are highly selected, concurrent use of antiarrhythmic drugs is included or excluded, redo procedures may or may not be included, and follow-up is frequently a year or less. The nature of the AF (paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent) greatly impacts success rates, which range from 20% to 85%. The procedure is probably infrequently a lifelong "cure" for AF. Best estimate of the risk of a complication from each procedure is about 4.5%, the commonest being tamponade (1.3%), vascular access complications (1.5%), and stroke or transient ischemic attach (1%). Risk of a fatal complication is estimated at 0.15%. There is no convincing evidence that the procedure decreases the risk of death, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure, but the available randomized trials have enrolled patients inappropriate for assessment of impact on these clinical outcomes. Much remains to be done. Currently the procedure is indicated for relief of symptoms in selected patients, usually who have failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
机译:心房纤颤(AF)的导管消融术是一种程序性治疗选择,尚未在AF节奏管理中找到最终的位置。到目前为止,除了肺静脉隔离以外,它还没有无可争议的机制基础。它是经验性的,不是根据诊断程序真正地个体化的。手术成功与否通常取决于房颤复发的程度。有关复发的现有数据有几个混杂因素。复发数据通常是主观的:它们基于调查和症状,而不是客观心电图(ECG)来确定复发,患者选择严格,包括或不包括同时使用抗心律失常药物,可能包括或可能不包括重做程序,并且遵循-up通常是一年或更短的时间。 AF的性质(阵发性,持续性,长期持续性)极大地影响成功率,成功率介于20%至85%之间。该程序可能很少是AF的终生“治愈”方法。对每个手术并发症风险的最佳估计约为4.5%,最常见的是填塞(1.3%),血管通路并发症(1.5%)和中风或短暂性脑缺血(1%)。致命并发症的风险估计为0.15%。没有令人信服的证据表明该手术降低了因心力衰竭而死亡,中风或住院的风险,但是可用的随机试验使患者不适合评估对这些临床结局的影响。还有很多工作要做。目前,该方法适用于减轻所选患者的症状,这些患者通常是抗心律不齐药物治疗失败的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号