首页> 外文期刊>The European physical journal, D. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics >The 4-particle hydrogen-antihydrogen system revisited - Twofold molecular Hamiltonian symmetry and natural atom antihydrogen
【24h】

The 4-particle hydrogen-antihydrogen system revisited - Twofold molecular Hamiltonian symmetry and natural atom antihydrogen

机译:再谈4粒子氢-反氢系统-双重分子哈密顿对称和天然原子反氢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The historical importance of the original quantum mechanical bond theory proposed by Heitler and London in 1927 as well as its pitfalls are reviewed. Modern ab initio treatments of H-(H) over bar systems are inconsistent with the logic behind algebraic Hamiltonians H+/- = H-0 +/- DeltaH for charge-symmetrical and charge-asymmetrical 4 unit charge systems like H-2 and H (H) over bar. Their eigenvalues E+/- = E-0 +/- beta are exactly those of 1927 Heitler-London (HL) theory. Since these 2 Hamiltonians are mutually exclusive, only the attractive one can apply for stable natural molecular H2. A wrong choice leads to problems with antiatom (H) over bar. In line with earlier results on band and line spectra, we now prove that HL chose the wrong Hamiltonian for H2. Their theory explains the stability of attractive system H-2 with a repulsive Hamiltonian H-0 + DeltaH instead of with the attractive one H-0 - DeltaH, representative for charge-asymmetrical system H (H) over bar. A new second order symmetry effect is detected in this attractive Hamiltonian, which leads to a 3-dimensional structure for the 4-particle system. Repulsive HL Hamiltonian H+ applies at long range but at the critical distance, attractive charge-inverted Hamiltonian H- takes over and leads to bond H-2 but in reality, H (H) over bar, for which we give an analytical proof. This analysis confirms and generalizes an earlier critique of the wrong long range behavior of HL-theory by Bingel, Preuss and Schmidtke and by Herring. Another wrong asymptote choice in the past also applies for atomic antihydrogen (H) over bar, which has hidden the Mexican hat potential for natural hydrogen. This generic solution removes most problems, physicists and chemists experience with atomic (H) over bar and molecular H (H) over bar, including the problem with antimatter in the Universe.
机译:回顾了海特勒和伦敦在1927年提出的原始量子力学键理论的历史重要性及其陷阱。 H-(H)在bar系统上的从头算起的现代处理与代数哈密顿量H +/- = H-0 +/- DeltaH背后的逻辑不一致,即电荷对称和电荷非对称4单元电荷系统,如H-2和H (H)过吧。它们的特征值E +/- = E-0 +/- beta正是1927年海特勒-伦敦(HL)理论的特征值。由于这两个哈密顿量是互斥的,因此只有有吸引力的一个可以申请稳定的天然分子H2。错误的选择会导致抗原子(H)超压问题。与先前在带谱和谱线上的结果一致,我们现在证明HL为H2选择了错误的哈密顿量。他们的理论解释了有吸引力的系统H-2的稳定性,该系统具有排斥性的哈密顿量H-0 + DeltaH,而不是有吸引力的一个H-0-DeltaH,它代表棒上的电荷非对称系统H(H)。在这个有吸引力的哈密顿量中检测到新的二阶对称效应,这导致了4粒子系统的3维结构。排斥性HL哈密顿量H +适用于远距离,但在临界距离处,有吸引力的电荷反转的哈密顿量H-接管并产生键H-2,但实际上,H(H)超过巴,为此我们提供了分析证明。该分析证实并概括了Bingel,Preuss和Schmidtke以及Herring对HL理论的错误远距离行为的较早批评。过去另一个错误的渐近线选择也适用于棒上的原子抗氢(H),这隐藏了墨西哥帽中天然氢的潜力。这种通用解决方案消除了物理学家和化学家在原子上高于原子和分子上高于分子上氢的问题,包括宇宙中反物质的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号