...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Who to pay for performance? The choice of organisational level for hospital performance incentives
【24h】

Who to pay for performance? The choice of organisational level for hospital performance incentives

机译:谁为表现付出代价?医院绩效激励的组织层次选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Financial incentives for quality improvement in hospital care [known as pay for performance (P4P)] can be directed to either the hospital level or redistributed to the department level. Theoretically, performance payments distributed to lower organisational levels are more effective in increasing performance than payments directed to the hospital level, but the empirical evidence for this expectation is scarce. This paper compares the performance of hospital departments at hospitals that do and do not redistribute performance payments to the department level. We study a Danish P4P scheme to provide patients with case managers. Applying difference in differences analysis, we estimate a 5 percentage points higher performance at hospital departments that are subject to a direct financial incentive. Our results suggest that payers can improve the effectiveness of P4P payments by distributing payments to the department level rather than the hospital level.
机译:可以提高医院护理质量的财务激励措施[称为绩效工资(P4P)]可以直接向医院一级或重新分配给部门一级。从理论上讲,分配给较低组织级别的绩效报酬比针对医院水平的绩效报酬在提​​高绩效方面更为有效,但是缺乏这种预期的经验证据。本文比较了将和不将绩效支付重新分配到部门级别的医院中医院部门的绩效。我们研究了丹麦的P4P计划,旨在为患者提供病例管理器。应用差异分析中的差异,我们估计受直接经济刺激的医院部门的绩效要高出5个百分点。我们的结果表明,付款人可以通过将付款分配到部门级别而不是医院级别来提高P4P付款的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号